Title
Philippine Communications Satellite Corp. vs. Globe Telecom, Inc.
Case
G.R. No. 147324
Decision Date
May 25, 2004
Globe Telecom terminated a lease agreement with Philcomsat due to U.S. military withdrawal, citing force majeure. Courts ruled Globe exempt from future rentals but liable for December 1992, denying Philcomsat’s claims for damages.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 147511)

Contractual Arrangement between Philcomsat and Globe

On 7 May 1991 Philcomsat and Globe executed an agreement under which Philcomsat would establish, operate and provide an IBS Standard B earth station at Cubi Point for the exclusive use of the USDCA. The contract term was 60 months. Globe agreed to pay monthly rentals per leased circuit. Section 7 governed discontinuance of service and provided that Globe must give 60 days’ written notice, continue paying rentals for the actual number of T1 circuits in use but not less than the first two T1s for the remaining life of the agreement, subject to possible renegotiation if Philcomsat reallocated use of the facility. Section 8 defined force majeure broadly to include, among other things, any law, order, regulation, direction or request of the Government of the Philippines; strikes; insurrection; national emergencies; acts of public enemies; and other circumstances beyond the control of the parties.

Constitutional and Political Background Affecting Performance

Both parties were aware that the RP‑US Military Bases Agreement was to expire in 1991. Under Section 25, Article XVIII of the 1987 Constitution, foreign military bases, troops or facilities are not allowed unless a new treaty is concurred in by the Senate and ratified as required. On 16 September 1991 the Senate adopted Resolution No. 141 declining to concur in ratification of the Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Security and its Supplementary Agreements. On 31 December 1991 the Philippine Government sent a Note Verbale to the U.S. informing it that the RP‑US Military Bases Agreement would terminate on 31 December 1992 and requesting withdrawal of all U.S. military forces from Subic by that date.

Facts Following the Political Decisions

Philcomsat installed and operated the earth station and USDCA utilized it. Globe, receiving a formal order from Cdr. Corliss (31 July 1992) and a notification from AT&T (29 July 1992), notified Philcomsat on 6 August 1992 that it intended to discontinue use effective 8 November 1992, citing Section 8 (force majeure) as the basis. Philcomsat responded on 10 August 1992 that Globe remained obligated to pay rentals for the remaining term per Section 7. After the complete withdrawal of U.S. forces at year‑end 1992, Philcomsat demanded payment of outstanding obligations totaling US$4,910,136.00 plus interest and attorneys’ fees. Globe refused, and Philcomsat filed suit on 27 January 1995.

Lower Court Decisions and Relief Sought

Philcomsat’s complaint sought liquidated damages, interest, exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees and costs. The Regional Trial Court (Makati, Branch 59) rendered judgment on 5 January 1999 ordering Globe to pay US$92,238.00 (rent for December 1992) with legal interest from December 1992, attorney’s fees of P300,000.00, dismissed Globe’s counterclaim, and imposed costs against Globe. Both parties appealed to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals Ruling

The Court of Appeals affirmed that the Senate’s non‑concurrence and the Philippine Government’s Note Verbale were acts/directions of the Government of the Philippines and thus constituted force majeure under Section 8 of the agreement. It also found other circumstances beyond the parties’ control (Cdr. Corliss’s order, AT&T notification, and the withdrawal of U.S. forces) which prevented further use of the earth station. The appellate court held Globe exempt from paying rentals for the remainder of the contract term but liable for rentals through December 1992 because the U.S. military retained control of Cubi Point until 31 December 1992.

Issues Presented to the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court considered three principal issues: (1) whether the Senate’s non‑ratification, the termination of the RP‑US Military Bases Agreement and the withdrawal of U.S. forces constitute force majeure exempting Globe from rental obligations; (2) whether Globe is liable for rentals for December 1992; and (3) whether Philcomsat is entitled to attorneys’ fees and exemplary damages.

Legal Principles Applied — Force Majeure and Contractual Autonomy

The Court applied Article 1174 of the Civil Code, which exempts obligors from liability for events that could not be foreseen or which, though foreseen, were inevitable. The Court emphasized that Article 1174 covers both natural (acts of God) and human acts (riots, strikes, war) and that parties may, under Article 1306, validly stipulate contractual definitions of force majeure provided they do not contravene law, morals, good customs, public order or public policy. Article 1159 (obligations from contract have the force of law between parties) was invoked to reiterate the binding effect of valid stipulations.

Application of Law to Facts — Existence of Force Majeure

The Court agreed with the lower courts that Section 8’s enumerated events fall within Article 1174’s concept of fortuitous events because they are either unforeseeable or foreseeable but inevitable. The Senate resolution and Note Verbale were acts of the Philippine Government beyond the parties’ control, and the formal order from Cdr. Corliss, AT&T’s notification, and the complete withdrawal of U.S. forces were further circumstances making performance impossible. The Court applied the three requisites for force majeure: independence from human will, impossibility of performance in the normal manner, and absence of the obligor’s participation or aggravation of the injury. Finding these elements satisfied, the Court concluded Globe was exempted from payment of rentals for the remaind

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.