Title
Supreme Court
Philippine Communications Satellite Corp. vs. Sandiganbayan 5th Division
Case
G.R. No. 203023
Decision Date
Jun 17, 2015
PHILCOMSAT sought to compel PCGG to lift opposition to PHC's stock listing; SC ruled it an intra-corporate dispute, under RTC jurisdiction, affirming dismissal.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 203023)

Relevant Facts

PHC, formerly known as Liberty Mines, Inc., executed a Memorandum of Agreement with PHILCOMSAT in 1995 to increase PHC's authorized capital stock. This agreement included a subscription by PHILCOMSAT for a significant number of shares in PHC. In March 2005, the PCGG requested to defer the listing of PHC's increased capital stock, citing unresolved corporate governance issues due to conflicting claims by different board members of the Philippine Overseas Telecommunication Corporation (POTC) and PHILCOMSAT. Despite PHC’s efforts to resolve these issues and the subsequent recognition by the PCGG of the validity of board meetings in 2007, the PCGG maintained objections to the share listing.

Procedural History

On February 1, 2012, PHILCOMSAT filed a complaint before the Sandiganbayan against the PCGG, seeking to compel the agency to rescind its objection to the listing of PHC's increased capital stock. Following the PCGG's motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction, the Sandiganbayan ruled to grant this motion, determining that the complaint was an intra-corporate dispute, thus falling under the jurisdiction of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) rather than the Sandiganbayan. The Sandiganbayan's decisions were promulgated on May 3, 2012, and August 14, 2012, respectively.

The Sandiganbayan's Ruling

The Sandiganbayan assessed that the nature of the complaint constituted an action for specific performance, attempting to compel the PCGG to withdraw its objection towards a corporate decision. It concluded that the RTC holds exclusive jurisdiction over such matters per Batas Pambansa Bilang 129 as amended by Republic Act No. 7691, thus dismissing the case based on the overlapping jurisdictional issues and the intra-corporate dispute between directors.

Petitioners' Arguments

The petitioners contended that the Sandiganbayan erred in concluding the case involved an intra-corporate dispute since the PCGG is neither a stockholder nor an officer of the involved corporations. They argued that the main issue is not about internal conflicts within the corporation but about the PCGG's alleged misuse of authority in evaluating the stock's eligibility for public listing.

Respondents' Arguments

In response, the PCGG maintained that the complaint indeed falls within the domain of intra-corporate controversies, which are typically adjudicated by the RTC. They emphasized that the PCGG's actions regarding the objection to listing were in defense of the Republic's ownership interests, thus validating its involvement in the matter.

The Court's Ruling

The Court affirmed the Sa

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.