Title
Perez vs. De la Torre
Case
A.C. No. 6160
Decision Date
Mar 30, 2006
A lawyer was suspended for three years after representing conflicting interests by assisting criminal suspects while also representing the victim's heirs, violating professional ethics.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 174333)

Allegations Against the Respondent

In a formal complaint to Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide, Jr., Perez accused De la Torre of misconduct, specifically for representing conflicting interests. The complaint detailed that in December 2001, De la Torre approached suspects Sonny Boy Ilo and Diego Avila, who were detained for murder and kidnapping. He purportedly misrepresented himself by suggesting that he could secure their release provided they signed extrajudicial confessions, without disclosing that he was simultaneously representing the heirs of the murder victim, Resurreccion Barrios.

Respondent's Defense

De La Torre defended his actions, asserting that both Ilo and Avila independently sought his legal assistance in drafting their confessions. He claimed to have advised them of their constitutional rights and requirements for a confession, while remaining convinced that neither was under duress. De La Torre's position maintains that he acted with the best intentions to ensure that the defendants were well-informed and represented.

Findings of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP)

The Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) investigated the complaints and submitted a report in August 2005, recommending a one-year suspension for De La Torre. The Board of Governors later increased the recommended suspension to two years, highlighting sufficient evidence that De La Torre had, indeed, represented conflicting interests by simultaneously offering his legal services to both the accused individuals and the victim's family.

Legal Basis for Misconduct

Under Rule 15.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, a lawyer is prohibited from representing clients with conflicting interests unless written consent is obtained from all parties after full disclosure of the conflict. The investigations concluded that De La Torre failed to obtain such consent and consciously engaged in actions that constituted a breach of ethical standards expected of lawyers.

Conclusion of Administrative Proceedings

The Court concurred with the IBP

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.