Title
People vs. ZZZ, accused-appellant.
Case
G.R. No. 265272
Decision Date
Nov 6, 2023
A father, ZZZ, was convicted of qualified rape and child abuse against his 14-year-old daughter, AAA, with corroborated testimonies and medical evidence affirming the charges.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 265272)

Charges and Conviction

ZZZ faced charges for Qualified Rape under Article 266-A, paragraph 1(a) of the Revised Penal Code (RPC) and Child Abuse under Section 5(b), Article III of Republic Act No. 7610 (RA 7610). The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Misamis Oriental convicted ZZZ on April 16, 2020, following a trial where both AAA's testimony and corroborating evidence were presented. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed this conviction on March 29, 2022.

Testimony of the Victim

AAA testified that on November 28, 2016, ZZZ entered her room, removed her pants and underwear, and assaulted her. She described feeling terrified and noted that ZZZ threatened her with violence if she reported the incident. On December 12, 2016, a similar event occurred, where ZZZ again assaulted her and threatened her life and the safety of her siblings. This testimony indicated a pattern of abuse and intimidation.

Defense and Denial

ZZZ denied the allegations, claiming he was sleeping in the same room as multiple family members at the time of the incidents. He asserted that nothing unusual happened and characterized AAA as an obedient child without motive to fabricate such claims.

RTC and CA Findings

The RTC found sufficient evidence to convict ZZZ of both charges, citing AAA's credible and consistent testimony, corroborating medical findings, and the testimony of her sister BBB, who noted improper behavior by ZZZ. The CA upheld these findings, indicating the credibility of AAA's testimony was key to establishing ZZZ's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Legal Assessment

The Court ruled that the elements of Qualified Rape were established—ZZZ had sexual intercourse with AAA, who was under eighteen and related to him. Moreover, the intimidation exerted by ZZZ fulfilled the requirements of rape under the law, particularly in cases of familial abuse where moral ascendancy is present.

Conclusion of Legal Proceedings

The Court affirmed ZZZ's conviction for Qualified Rape an

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.