Title
People vs. Yanga
Case
G.R. No. L-7617
Decision Date
Nov 28, 1956
Yanga, charged with light threats, objected to dismissal, claiming double jeopardy and prescription. Court ruled no double jeopardy as grave coercion was distinct; prescription interrupted by timely filing.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 198010)

Jurisdiction and Applicable Law

The case was originally prosecuted in the Municipal Court of Manila under the Revised Penal Code, particularly addressing issues of double jeopardy and the prescription of criminal offenses. The applicable law for this decision is rooted in the provisions of the Revised Penal Code that govern the prescription of offenses and double jeopardy.

Background of the Case

On October 10, 1951, Pelagio G. Yanga was charged with light threats for allegedly threatening Cristeto Remigio by pointing a revolver at him. The appellant pleaded not guilty to the charges. Subsequently, on June 1, 1952, the private prosecutor moved to dismiss this charge, citing that a separate charge of grave coercion had already been filed against Yanga in the Court of First Instance of Manila on May 21, 1952. The Municipal Court dismissed the light threats charge on June 12, 1952.

Charges and Dismissals

The information for grave coercion, which was filed after the initial complaint for light threats, detailed several acts of violence against Remigio, including physically compelling him against his will. The substantive differences between the two charges are significant: the charge of light threats centers around the act of intimidation (pointing a revolver), while grave coercion involves physical force to compel action.

Argument on Double Jeopardy

Yanga contended that the dismissal of the light threats charge acted as a bar to the prosecution for grave coercion, asserting that the crimes were essentially the same. The court analyzed the material elements of both offenses and determined that the crimes are distinct. Since the evidence required for a conviction of light threats does not support a conviction for grave coercion, the principle of double jeopardy was not violated.

Prescription of Offense

Regarding Yanga's claim that the crime of unjust vexation had prescribed, the court clarified that light offenses, including unjust vexation, have a prescription period of two months. The court recognized that the filing

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.