Title
People vs. Yabut
Case
G.R. No. 39085
Decision Date
Sep 27, 1933
Prisoner Antonio Yabut fatally attacked fellow inmate Sabas Aseo during a debt dispute in Bilibid Prison. Convicted of homicide, not murder, due to insufficient proof of treachery, Yabut received the maximum penalty under Article 160.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 39085)

Trial Court Findings

Eyewitnesses, including the brigade chief inmate Villafuerte, testified that Yabut wielded the wooden club (Exhibit C) and attacked Aseo without provocation. Yabut attempted to resist disarming and threatened Villafuerte, then fled and hid in a latrine before being captured by another prison guard inmate. The court rejected Yabut’s claim that Villafuerte delivered the fatal blow.

Medical Evidence

Two physicians—Dr. Santiago Estrada (Bureau of Prisons) and Dr. Pablo Anzures (University of the Philippines Medico-Legal Department)—confirmed that Aseo’s death resulted from skull fracture and ensuing hemorrhages. Their testimony corroborated that the blows were delivered from behind and inflicted with treacherous intent.

Assignments of Error on Appeal

  1. Misapplication of Article 160, RPC
  2. Failure to credit and corroborate defense evidence
  3. Erroneous finding of qualifying circumstance of treachery (alevosia)
  4. Insufficient proof of murder beyond reasonable doubt

Interpretation of Article 160, RPC

Article 160 mandates that any convict who commits a new felony while serving sentence shall receive the maximum penalty prescribed for the new offense. The Court held that neither the Spanish text nor the original intent of Article 160 limits its application to crimes different in character from the one for which the convict is serving time. Headnotes and captions serve only as catchwords and cannot override clear statutory language.

Treachery and Degree of Homicide

While the evidence plainly established that Yabut acted with intent to kill and inflicted lethal blows, some members of the Court expressed reasonable doubt as

    ...continue reading

    Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
    Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.