Title
People vs. Vizcarra
Case
G.R. No. L-38859
Decision Date
Jul 30, 1982
Four men convicted of raping and strangling a 14-year-old waitress in 1969; death penalty imposed due to heinous nature and aggravating circumstances.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-38859)

Factual Background

Erlinda Manzano was reported missing by her parents after she did not return home from her job as a waitress. Two days later, her body was discovered in almost a naked state, with evidence indicating that she had been sexually assaulted and strangled. Medical examinations confirmed the cause of death as ligature strangulation, and there were signs of sexual intercourse involving force.

Investigation and Charges

The police undertook a manhunt for the suspects, resulting in the arrest of several individuals, including the accused. In their confessions, the accused admitted to partaking in the rape of Erlinda, detailing their respective roles in the crime. A formal complaint, signed by Erlinda's father and the Assistant Fiscal, led to charges of rape with homicide against the accused.

Trial Proceedings

During the trial, the accused presented alibis to contest the prosecution's case, claiming they were engaged in unrelated activities at the time of the incident. The trial court, however, found these alibis unconvincing, especially given the testimonies of state witness Rodolfo Bagtasos, who provided a detailed account of the events leading to Erlinda's death.

Verdict and Sentencing

The trial court convicted Vizcarra, Salamatin, Delos Reyes, and Fernando, sentencing them to death based on Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code, considering the occurrence of multiple aggravating circumstances such as the nighttime setting and the use of superior strength in committing the crime.

Appeal and Judicial Review

The case was subject to mandatory review, and during the appellate process, the appellants challenged not only the evidence presented against them but also the validity of their confessions, alleging coercion. Ultimately, the court upheld the trial court’s findings, stating that the overwhelming evidence supported their convictions.

Legal Principles and Findings

The court reiterated the legal principle that alibi is generally a weak defense and emphasized that the confessions made by the appellants were truthful and consensual. The court distinguished between the roles of each accused i

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.