Title
People vs. Villapando y Bunsol
Case
G.R. No. 73656
Decision Date
Oct 5, 1989
Rogelio Villapando stabbed Romulo Manalo to death and injured Alicia Beron and Ramon Tolentino during a 1979 altercation. His alibi defense failed; murder was reduced to homicide, and attempted homicide charges were downgraded due to lack of intent and treachery.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 73656)

Charges and Initial Proceedings

Villapando was charged with murder (CCC-VIII-823(79)) and attempted homicide in two separate cases (Criminal Cases Nos. 770 and 771). The murder charge alleged that Villapando fatally stabbed Saturno Manalo, with the additional circumstances of treachery or evident premeditation. The attempted homicide charges involved Villapando attacking Alicia Beron and Ramon Tolentino, resulting in injuries that required medical attention.

Trial Court's Decisions

After trial, the Regional Trial Court found Villapando guilty. In the murder case, he was sentenced to reclusion perpetua, with additional financial penalties to the victim's heirs. For the attempted homicides, he received a sentence of twenty days for one case and a term ranging from six months and one day to two years and one day for the other.

Appeal and Defense

Dissatisfied with the decisions, Villapando appealed, asserting that the trial court neglected his defense of alibi supported by credible witnesses and failed to adequately address inconsistencies in the prosecution's testimony. The defense aimed to establish that Villapando was in San Pablo City during the incident, supported by testimony from an eyewitness who claimed he was not the assailant.

Court's Analysis of Alibi and Credibility of Witnesses

The Supreme Court found the appeal without merit, emphasizing that for alibi to effectively exonerate a defendant, it must be corroborated by clear evidence proving the impossibility of their presence at the crime scene. The proximity of San Pablo City to Batangas City, along with questionable evidence regarding the timing of a watch purchase, weakened Villapando's alibi.

Identification of the Accused

Eyewitness testimonies from Ramon Tolentino and Nelia Panganiban positively identified Villapando as the assailant. Their accounts described a clear sequence of events leading to the stabbing, with both witnesses directly attributing the attacks to him despite the defense's efforts to discredit them.

Evaluation of Treachery and Other Circumstances

The Court clarified that for treachery to be present, the nature of the attack must indicate premeditation and an assurance of execution without risk to the assailant. In this case, given the lack of evidence regarding how the altercation began, the Court concluded that treachery could not be established, reducing the murder charge to simple homicide.

Final Decisions on Sentencing and Damages

The Court agreed with the trial court's findings on attempted homicides but modified charges against Villapando for inadequate intent to k

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.