Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Villanueva y Bautista
Case
G.R. No. 230723
Decision Date
Feb 13, 2019
A 15-year-old minor was abducted, raped, and identified her assailant. The Supreme Court convicted the accused of rape, dismissing forcible abduction as absorbed by rape, and imposed reclusion perpetua with increased damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 230723)

Facts of the Case

On August 2, 2006, a formal charge was filed against Jupiter Villanueva y Bautista for the forcible abduction of a minor, identified as AAA, who was fifteen years old at the time. The Information alleged that the accused, armed with a bladed weapon and in conspiracy with unidentified accomplices, forcibly took AAA against her will, inflicted physical harm, and committed sexual acts upon her. During the trial, the prosecution presented multiple witnesses, including AAA, her aunt BBB, and police officers, to substantiate the claims made against Villanueva.

Testimonies and Evidence

AAA testified that she was approached by masked men, one of whom was later identified as Villanueva, while she was walking in Antipolo City. The men abducted her, taking her in a tricycle while covering her eyes. During her captivity, she was subjected to unwanted physical advances and ultimately raped. The prosecution relied heavily on AAA’s eyewitness account, corroborated by the testimony of her aunt and medical findings that indicated trauma consistent with sexual assault. Medical examinations revealed severe injuries, including lacerations, supporting the claims of rape.

Defense Claims

In defense, Villanueva presented an alibi, claiming that he was elsewhere during the abduction. He stated he was working at a market at the time and only became aware of the accusations when police sought him out. Nonetheless, this alibi was deemed weak due to the lack of corroborating witnesses and the proximity of his work location to where the incident occurred. The Regional Trial Court found his defense to lack credibility when weighed against AAA's more compelling and consistent testimonies.

Ruling of the Regional Trial Court

On October 9, 2014, the RTC convicted Villanueva of forcible abduction with rape, imposing the penalty of reclusion perpetua and ordering him to pay civil and moral damages to AAA. The court affirmed the credibility of the victim’s testimony and found sufficient evidence of the elements of both forcible abduction and rape, including the psychological and physical aspects of the assault.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

The decision was appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which upheld the RTC’s conviction on August 31, 2016, but modified the amount of damages awarded to AAA, increasing them to P75,000 for both civil indemnity and moral damages. The CA reiterated the credibility of AAA’s testimony and rejected the claims of undue influence in her identification of Villanueva, affirming the findings of the lower court.

Supreme Court's Review

Upon further appeal, the Supreme Court meticulously reviewed the records and determined the appeal lacked merit. The Court reaffirmed the findings from both the RTC and CA, emphasizing that credible testimonies had been provided by AAA and corroborated by multiple witnesses. Th

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.