Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Vidana
Case
G.R. No. 199210
Decision Date
Oct 23, 2013
Father convicted of raping his 15-year-old daughter; Supreme Court upheld conviction, imposed life imprisonment, and awarded damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 192221)

Key Dates

The appellate history includes the issuance of an arrest warrant on September 1, 2004, for the appellant, who was subsequently arrested and arraigned on January 30, 2006. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) delivered its decision on June 26, 2009, while the Court of Appeals affirmed this decision on March 18, 2011.

Applicable Law

The case involves charges under Republic Act No. 7610, known as the "Special Protection of Children Against Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination Act," particularly addressing the nuances of crimes against minors. Additionally, legal interpretations refer to the Revised Penal Code regarding the definition of rape.

Facts of the Case

The prosecution alleges that on September 16, 2003, the accused, under the guise of a father figure, raped his daughter AAA, then 15 years old. After forcibly removing her clothes while threatening her to remain silent, he penetrated her. Following the incident, AAA confided in family friends, who facilitated her report to the police. Medical examination corroborated signs of her trauma.

In contrast, the defense presented a narrative where the appellant claims he was not present during the alleged crime, as AAA resided with friends at the time. He argued that his son EEE corroborated this assertion, aiming to create reasonable doubt regarding the claimed timeline.

Trial Court's Ruling

The RTC found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and awarding moral damages to AAA. The ruling focused on the credibility of AAA's testimony and the overwhelming evidence presented by the prosecution.

Appellant's Appeal

The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeals, arguing that the lower court erred in convicting him based on what he considered uncorroborated testimony and assertions of dictating AAA's life. He maintained that her lack of resistance should negate the charge, thereby seeking an acquittal.

Court of Appeals' Assessment

The appellate court upheld the RTC's evaluation of the credibility of the prosecution witness, stressing the principle that victims' testimonies, particularly in rape cases, can independently result in convictions. The court rejected the appellant's claims and affirmed the lower court’s findings, emphasizing the emotional and credible narrative presented by AAA during her testimony.

Judicial Findings

The Court reiterated the established jurisprudence that rape does not necessarily require physical resistance, particularly in cases of incest where the accused's moral ascendancy can overpower the victim's will. The court language reinforced that denial and alibi defenses are seen as inherently weak against compelling testimonies.

Modifications to Sentencing

Despite affirming the basics of the conviction, the Court acknowledged procedural discrepancies in labelin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.