Title
People vs. Tio
Case
G.R. No. 132482-83
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2001
Eliseo Tio shot Albert Lestino during a heated argument over unpaid debt, using an unlicensed firearm. Convicted of murder with treachery, Tio’s claim of being framed was dismissed. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, modified damages, and upheld reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 132482-83)

Incident Overview

The incident occurred on the evening of 28 October 1996 at the Baguio First Hotel, where Eliseo Tio, along with friends including Richard Acop, was engaged in business discussions over drinks. Tensions escalated between Tio and Lestino when Tio attempted to collect an unpaid debt, leading to a heated argument. Following multiple interventions to calm Tio, he left the venue only to return armed, where he fatally shot Lestino twice in quick succession.

Eyewitness Accounts

The prosecution presented several eyewitnesses, including Richard Acop, who detailed the events leading up to the shooting. Multiple witnesses testified to seeing Tio shoot Lestino, while forensic evidence corroborated their accounts; the autopsy revealed Lestino suffered two gunshot wounds consistent with the described circumstances of the shooting.

Defense Position

In his defense, Tio admitted to holding the gun but claimed that he did not shoot Lestino. He maintained that during the chaos, another individual, Richard Acop, had fired the shots. Nonetheless, the trial court found Tio’s narrative unconvincing, attributing his assertions to self-serving motives while crediting the consistency of the prosecution's witnesses.

Credibility of Witnesses

The trial court evaluated the credibility of the witnesses presented by the prosecution, dismissing Tio's claims regarding bias based on familial ties among the witnesses. Their testimonies were deemed credible and corroborative. The presence of a neutral bystander further reinforced the accusation against Tio.

Court Findings and Rulings

The trial court determined that Tio acted with treachery, having ambushed an unarmed Lestino. The court emphasized that the act of firing at a defenseless individual constituted a heightened moral culpability. The illegal possession of an unlicensed firearm was treated as an aggravating circumstance but was not punished separately.

Civil Damages

In relation to civil liability, the court awarded P50,000 as civil indemnity for Lestino's death and found the prior judgment of P500,000 for moral damages excessive, reducing it to P50,000. The claim for actual damages amounting to P350,345 was rejected due to lack of substantiating evidence. Furthermore, the court revised the computation of loss of earning capacity to P4,680,000 based on Lestino's projected remaining working years adjusted for the variables impacting his construction business.

Final Sen

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.