Title
Source: Supreme Court
People vs. Telen
Case
G.R. No. 136142
Decision Date
Oct 24, 2000
Pastor Telen convicted for possessing 1,560.16 board feet of lumber without legal documents under P.D. 705; penalty modified to 6 months to 6 years.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 136142)

Applicable Law

The principal law applicable in this case is Presidential Decree No. 705, which governs the cutting, gathering, and possession of timber and other forest products in the Philippines. Specifically, Section 68 of the decree imposes penalties for cutting or possessing such products without the necessary legal documents.

Facts of the Case

On October 29, 1993, Telen and his co-accused were apprehended while transporting 1,560.16 board feet of assorted lumber. Police Officers initiated a chase after observing a suspicious cargo truck. The vehicle was stopped, and the driver, Genol, was unable to present any legal documentation from the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) regarding the lumber. Following the initial investigation, the lumber was seized, and Telen was charged with violating forestry laws.

Defense Arguments

In his defense, Pastor Telen asserted that he had secured verbal permission from Boy Leonor, the Officer in Charge of the DENR-CENRO, to cut Dita trees for renovation purposes. He contended that written documentation was unnecessary given Leonor’s assurance. Telen also mentioned that he had replanted Gemelina seedlings as part of his commitment to replace the cut trees.

Decision of the Trial Court

The Regional Trial Court of Maasin found Pastor Telen guilty of violating Section 68 of Presidential Decree No. 705 and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua, while acquitting his co-accused due to insufficient evidence against them. The court ordered the confiscation of the lumber, directing its sale at public auction with proceeds returned to the National Treasury.

Appeal and Legal Reasoning

Telen appealed the conviction, asserting errors in the trial court's judgment. He claimed that the court misapplied the law regarding the imposition of penalties and that there was insufficient evidence to support the alleged value of the lumber. The appellate court upheld that Telen's possession of the lumber without necessary legal documentation constituted a clear violation of forestry law, reinforcing the notion that motive was irrelevant in the commission of mala prohibita offenses.

Moreover, it clarified that the absence of proper documentation obligates the owner to assume liability regardless of compliance with verbal permissions. The appellate c

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.