Title
People vs. Tapere y Polpol
Case
G.R. No. 178065
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2013
Arnold Tapere convicted for illegal shabu sale; SC upheld entrapment ruling, rejecting instigation claim, affirming life imprisonment and P500,000 fine.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 176947)

Antecedents of the Case

On September 3, 2002, an information was filed against Tapere, charging him with the illegal sale of one plastic sachet containing Methamphetamine Hydrochloride, commonly known as shabu, in violation of Section 5, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002). The evidence presented included Tapere selling shabu to a poseur buyer, Gabriel Salgado, during a buy-bust operation conducted by the PDEA on September 2, 2002. Tapere was already in the PDEA’s drug watch list due to prior complaints from the community regarding his drug activities.

Buy-Bust Operation

The PDEA agents organized the buy-bust operation after conducting surveillance on Tapere, which included a test buy. The agents secured a certification from the Office of the City Prosecutor regarding the buy-bust money, specifically a P100.00 bill, which was later confirmed to be used in the transaction. During the operation, Salgado bought shabu from Tapere, and upon completion of the sale, the PDEA agents immediately arrested Tapere.

Evidence Collection and Laboratory Examination

Following Tapere's arrest, the agents recovered not only the buy-bust money but also three additional sachets of shabu from Tapere's possession. The seized items were taken to the PDEA headquarters, where a request for laboratory examination was prepared. The PNP Crime Laboratory subsequently confirmed that the substances contained Methamphetamine Hydrochloride.

Trial Proceedings and RTC Decision

During the trial, Tapere denied the charges against him and claimed that he was instigated by Salgado, who he alleged was under probation and known to be a drug user. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found him guilty, asserting that the buy-bust operation was legitimate, and no convincing evidence was provided to support Tapere's claim of instigation. The RTC sentenced him to life imprisonment and ordered him to pay a fine of P500,000.00.

Court of Appeals Ruling

On appeal, the Court of Appeals upheld the RTC's decision. It noted that the prosecution adequately established the elements of illegal sale of shabu and rejected Tapere's argument that his arrest resulted from instigation rather than entrapment. The court asserted that the absence of Salgado's testimony did not impair the prosecution’s case, as the PDEA agents present corroborated the details of the transaction.

Issues Raised

The central issue raised in this case was whether Tapere's arrest stemmed from instigation, which would require acquittal, or legitimate entrapment. Tapere contended that the latter applied, arguing that he was coerced into committing the crime by Salgado, an undercover agent.

Ruling of the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court's ruling, elaborating on the legal distinctions between instigation an

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.