Title
People vs. Tan Diong
Case
G.R. No. 39177
Decision Date
Feb 21, 1934
Tan Diong transferred real properties to Baranda to evade creditors; found guilty of fraud. Padla and Baranda acquitted due to lack of complicity, but civil action remains possible.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 39177)

Background Facts

Tan Diong was a merchant in good standing who had incurred significant debts to various merchants in Cebu, culminating in a judgment against him favoring Lim Tian Ting & Co. for over P5,000. Following the issuance of execution on this judgment, only a meager amount of P198.23 was realized from the levy on Tan Diong's personal property. Prior to these proceedings, Tan Diong and his wife, Pastora Padla, transferred all their real estate holdings to Eustaquio Baranda. Evidence indicated that this transfer was intended to shield the properties from Tan Diong’s creditors, with the consideration stated in the deeds being fictitious.

Conviction of Tan Diong

The Court found sufficient evidence that Tan Diong was guilty of making a fraudulent conveyance for the purpose of deceiving his creditors. His actions in transferring property were clearly intentional to obstruct his creditors from claiming their dues. The original ruling imposed a substantial sentence of six years and one day of imprisonment for Tan Diong, which was later modified to an indeterminate sentence ranging from one year to eight years and one day.

Role of Eustaquio Baranda

Regarding Eustaquio Baranda, the Court noted that he was not an active participant in the conveyancing process. His involvement in the fraud could only be inferred from his acceptance of the benefits derived from the fraudulent transactions. The Court did not find sufficient evidence to establish his guilt as a co-conspirator, primarily because he did not participate in the conveyances executed by Tan Diong and Padla.

Role of Pastora Padla

Pastora Padla’s role was of particular interest due to her status as Tan Diong's wife. While she participated in the conveyances, the Court emphasized that the creditors defrauded were those of Tan Diong, not Padla. Therefore, her mere involvement in the execution of the conveyances did not implicate her in the fraudulent intent to h

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.