Title
People vs. Taijo Yokimiso
Case
G.R. No. 21884
Decision Date
Jul 31, 1924
Two Japanese men, Taijo Yokimiso and Kumekichi Saito, were convicted for robbery with homicide after confessing their involvement in the crime; court upheld their sentences based on admissible confessions and independent evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 21884)

Facts of the Case

The crime took place on September 21 and 22, 1923, when witnesses testified to seeing the accused with the deceased prior to the altercation. Maria Castro observed two Japanese men, one tall and the other shorter, at the store of Sato. Later, on September 24, Sato's body was discovered with twenty-seven wounds, indicating a violent death caused by multiple stabs, including fatal wounds in critical areas of the neck and back. Evidence, including bloodstains and weapons, was found in the possession of the accused, leading to their arrest on the same day.

Evidence and Testimonies

Lt. Antonio Xerez Burgos discovered the victim’s body and various incriminating items, including bloodstained clothing and a knife which Saito admitted to using during the attack. Both Yokimiso and Saito provided sworn statements implicating themselves and each other in the murder, revealing a premeditated plan to rob Sato, culminating in a violent confrontation resulting in his death.

Legal Analysis - Criminal Responsibility

The court established that both appellants acted in concert with Tabuche to commit robbery while causing Sato's death. They were prosecuted under Article 503, case No. 1 of the Penal Code, which outlines robbery with homicide as a serious offense. The circumstances of evident premeditation and treachery were present, but were mitigated by the defendants' admission of fear concerning Tabuche’s threats, affecting the degree of their culpability.

Verdict and Sentencing

The trial court sentenced both Yokimiso and Saito to cadena perpetua, emphasizing their direct involvement in both the robbery and the homicide. They were also ordered to return the stolen items and pay damages to the deceased's heirs, solidifying their criminal liability under the applicable law of the time.

Appeals and Admission of Evidence

The defense contended that the trial court erred in admitting their extrajudicial confessions as evidence. The court affirmed that these confessions adhered to updated legal standards regarding admissibility, emphasizing the obligation of the def

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.