Title
People vs. Sator
Case
G.R. No. 118025
Decision Date
Feb 12, 1997
Dr. Rebecco Sator convicted of murdering Susan Marayan, his lover, in 1987. Evidence included hair strands in his car, witness testimony, and motive to conceal their affair. Penalty: reclusion perpetua.
A

Case Summary (G.R. No. 118025)

Events Leading to the Murder

On the evening of July 4, 1987, Remedios Adolfo was approached by Susan Marayan, who requested her to accompany her while waiting for Dr. Sator. They took a passenger jeep to a location near the Mabolo Police Station, where Dr. Sator picked up Susan in his green Toyota. Her mother, Albina Marayan, grew anxious when Susan did not return home that night. The following day, her burned and naked body was discovered in a secluded area of Barangay Fuente in Carmen, Cebu City.

Criminal Investigation

The National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) conducted an investigation following the discovery of Susan's body. Initial findings included hair strands collected from the baggage compartment of Dr. Sator's car, which were found to be similar to those of the victim. The NBI impounded two vehicles owned by Sator's wife, leading to evidence that linked Sator to the crime scene. Moreover, evidence indicated that the victim had suffered asphyxiation by strangulation prior to being burned.

Charges and Court Proceedings

Dr. Sator was charged with murder on August 3, 1987, alongside two unknown accomplices. He pleaded not guilty during his arraignment on September 11, 1987, and a trial ensued. The prosecution presented multiple testimonies and evidence, including the deceased's love letters to Sator, which indicated their illicit relationship. The autopsy confirmed the cause of death was asphyxia due to strangulation, and extensive burns on her body suggested an attempt to destroy evidence.

Witness Testimonies

Several witnesses testified against Dr. Sator, notably Ireneo Tangaro, who claimed to have witnessed Sator strangling Susan in the car on the night of the murder. Other witnesses corroborated his presence in the area around the time of the incident. Additionally, Sator's post-murder behavior, including wearing long sleeves consistently, raised suspicions.

Defense and Alibi

In his defense, Dr. Sator admitted to having an affair with Susan but claimed he dropped her off at a clinic before going to various locations, including a singing venue and a bowling place. His witnesses supported this alibi; however, these places' proximity to the crime scene cast doubt on his claims of being elsewhere during the murder.

Verdict and Sentencing

After evaluating the evidence, the Regional Trial Court found Dr. Sator guilty of murder and sentenced him to imprisonment. The Court of Appeals upheld the conviction but modified the sentence, emphasizing the absence of aggravatin

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.