Title
People vs. Santos
Case
G.R. No. L-62072
Decision Date
Nov 11, 1985
Renato Santos stabbed Danilo Mangaliman in prison, leading to his death. Santos confessed; co-accused acquitted due to inadmissible hearsay evidence and lack of conspiracy proof. Santos’ death sentence reduced to reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-62072)

Facts of the Case

The case revolves around the murder of Danilo Mangaliman, which occurred inside the New Bilibid Prison on January 16, 1977, where all parties involved were serving sentences for previous convictions. The accused conspired to attack and subsequently stab the victim following a heated argument. Renato Santos admitted to the crime by surrendering to a prison officer immediately after the stabbing. The victim was taken to the prison hospital but succumbed to his injuries the following day due to profuse hemorrhage from a stab wound in the abdomen.

Trial Court Proceedings

During the trial, Renato Santos pled guilty, whereas his co-accused pleaded not guilty. Evidence was presented, including testimonials from prison officers and a medico-legal expert, but there was a significant reliance on the eyewitness account from another inmate, Romeo Fernandez. However, Fernandez did not testify in court, which became a critical point of contention.

Admission of Hearsay Evidence

The defendants challenged their conviction on the basis that the trial court's findings were founded on hearsay evidence—specifically, the sworn statement of Romeo Fernandez, which was not subjected to cross-examination. The court observed that the right to confrontation, as enshrined in the Constitution, mandates that defendants must have the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses against them. The reliance on hearsay evidence constituted a significant violation of their constitutional rights.

Evaluation of Evidence

The Supreme Court reviewed the testimonies of witnesses presented by the prosecution, concluding that none implicated the co-accused directly in the crime. The case against the co-accused was built largely on unsupported affiliations to Santos's actions. The court noted that while Santos confessed to inflicting the fatal stab wound, there was no evidence supporting any conspiracy among the co-accused with him during the crime.

Acquittal of Co-Accused

Due to the lack of direct evidence linking the co-accused to the murder, their convictions were overturned, leading to thei

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.