Title
People vs. Santiago y Ibay
Case
G.R. No. 94472
Decision Date
Mar 3, 1992
Accused-appellant convicted of illegal sale of shabu in a buy-bust operation; life imprisonment affirmed, subsidiary imprisonment deleted.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 126297)

Charges and Allegations

Fernando Santiago y Ibay was charged with the sale and possession of illegal drugs, specifically marijuana and shabu, as well as illegal possession of live ammunition. The charges dated back to May 6, 1989, where he allegedly sold shabu for P150.00 and possessed marijuana leaves and live ammunition without legal authority.

Proceedings and Evidence

During the trial, the prosecution presented testimonies from police officers involved in a buy-bust operation targeting Santiago, who was identified as a drug pusher based on community complaints. Police Officer Ancayan acted as the poseur buyer in the operation, wherein he allegedly purchased shabu from Santiago, leading to the latter’s arrest along with the recovery of an amount of buy-bust money, marijuana, and live ammunition. Forensic analysis confirmed the substances were illegal drugs.

Defense Presentation

The appellant denied the allegations, asserting that he was wrongfully arrested by police who came to his home. Santiago claimed that he did not possess any illegal drugs and that the ammunition belonged to a military acquaintance. He contended that he was coerced into signing documents and confessed to crimes he did not commit.

Trial Court’s Ruling

After hearing both sides, the Regional Trial Court found Santiago guilty of selling shabu but acquitted him of the charges of possessing marijuana and live ammunition due to insufficient evidence. He was sentenced to reclusion perpetua and fined P20,000. The court ordered the forfeiture of the confiscated items.

Appellate Arguments

The appellant argued that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and claimed inconsistencies in the testimonies of the police witnesses. Despite their testimonies lacking direct observation of the drug transaction, the court concluded that the act of selling illegal drugs was established through the successful buy-bust operation.

Credibility of Witnesses

The appellate court emphasized the principle that the sale of illegal drugs is consummated once the transaction is certified, focusing on the testimony of the poseur buyer. It was determined that the testimonies of the police officers were consistent and credible, supporting the conclusion of Santiago's guilt. The evidence indicated that illegal drugs were sold in exchange for money as detailed in the prosecution's case.

Sentencing and Legal Implications

The appellate court reiterated the legal stipulations governing sentencing for drug-related offenses. The court observed that the penalty of reclusion perpetua mandated life imprisonment without the option for subsidiary imprisonment if the imposed penalty exceeded certain

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.