Title
People vs. Santiago
Case
G.R. No. 32455
Decision Date
Aug 6, 1930
Gervasio Santiago, a repeat offender, deceived Jesus Pereira by posing as a company agent to sell a non-existent filter, inducing a P20 check. Convicted of estafa, his prior convictions warranted additional imprisonment.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 32455)

Facts of the Case

On March 13, 1929, Gervasio Santiago approached Jesus Pereira at Pereira's residence in Manila, claiming to be an agent of the Radium Ore Navigator Company. Santiago attempted to sell Pereira a filter, initially facing refusal, but eventually persuaded him to purchase the item by making exaggerated claims about his sales and offering a deal. Pereira, with only P20 on hand, issued a check for this amount, payable to "cash," which Santiago requested instead of his name. Santiago provided a receipt and promised to return the same day to deliver the filter.

Development of Events

Later that day, Santiago returned, requesting a recommendation for another sale but failed to fulfill his promise to deliver the filter. Pereira's suspicions led to him contacting the Radium Ore Navigator Company, where he learned that Santiago was not an employee. Subsequently, Pereira reported the incident to the police, submitted the receipt, and viewed a rogues' gallery, where he identified Santiago.

Legal Arguments

Santiago asserted that since the check was never presented for payment, no fraud had occurred. However, the court held that the mere possession of the check by Santiago, which prevented Pereira from accessing his funds, constituted sufficient temporary prejudice to establish the crime of estafa, as per relevant case law (U.S. vs. Goyenechea; U.S. vs. Malong).

Criminal History and Conviction

Santiago had a significant prior criminal record, with nine previous convictions for estafa, and he had completed a sentence in April 1927. The court was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt based on Pereira's testimony and Santiago's extensive criminal history.

Applicable Law and Penalty

The crime of estafa is defined under Article 535, number 1, of the Penal Code, punishable under Article 534, number 1, as amended by Act No. 3244. Given Santiago's habitual criminal status due to multiple prior convictions, the penalty prescribed was

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.