Title
People vs. Sandico y Gabriel
Case
G.R. No. 128104
Decision Date
May 18, 1999
Father convicted of raping daughter in shared family space; victim's credible testimony, fear, and trauma outweighed lack of physical evidence and delayed reporting.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 128104)

Charges and Verdicts

Hernani Sandico was charged with two counts of rape against his daughter. For Crim. Case No. 15896-MN, he was found guilty and sentenced to reclusion perpetua, ordered to pay an indemnity of P30,000, and costs. However, in Crim. Case No. 15897-MN, he was acquitted. The conviction was contested on the grounds of credibility of the testimony and alleged lack of evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Incidents of Rape

The two rape incidents took place on May 19 and May 21, 1995. The first incident occurred when Marivic returned home late from work, where she was confronted by Hernani, who then forcibly engaged in sexual intercourse with her. The second incident happened in the afternoon when Hernani, under the influence of alcohol, threatened Marivic with a bladed weapon, leading to another act of sexual violence. After this incident, Marivic fled to her grandmother's house to report the abuse.

Medical Examination and Findings

Following the incidents, Marivic underwent a medical examination by Dr. De Perio-Daniel, who reported that while there were no physical injuries or lacerations, the condition of Marivic's hymen—a form allowing penetration without injury—did not negate the occurrence of rape. The absence of laceration was argued against the credibility of the rape claim, but the legal understanding allows for penetration to constitute rape, irrespective of physical injury.

Defense Arguments

The defense claimed that Marivic's allegations stemmed from resentment due to prior maltreatment by Hernani, asserting that her testimony lacked credibility. It was contended that the nature of the household, with family members sharing a sleeping space, made the incidents improbable. Additionally, Hernani argued that he was simply drinking with his family at the time of the alleged second incident and described his actions as exaggerated and misconstrued.

Assessing Witness Credibility

The court noted that witness credibility, especially from the victim, is a crucial factor. The trial court found Marivic's testimony to be consistent, detailed, and emotionally resonant, making her account believable in the context of familial relationships and psychological intimidation inherent in incestuous assaults. The court held that the moral ascendancy of a father over his daughter could replace notions of physical force.

Delays in Reporting

Hernani's defense highlighted the significant delay in Marivic filing the rape complaint. However, the court reaffirmed that delays in reporting, particularly in cases of incest and domestic abuse where fear and shame are prevalent, should not adversely affect the victim's credibility. Such delays are not uncommon in the context of

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.