Title
People vs. Sanchez
Case
G.R. No. 131116
Decision Date
Aug 27, 1999
Mayor Antonio Sanchez and accomplices convicted of two counts of murder for ambushing political rival Nelson Peñalosa and his companion in 1991. Conspiracy, treachery, and evident premeditation proven; sentenced to reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 215280)

Case Background and Procedural History

On March 1, 1994, an information for double murder was filed against the accused by Senior State Prosecutor Hernani T. Barrios. The trial commenced in the Regional Trial Court, Calamba, Laguna, with arraignments occurring on April 10, 1995, where all accused pleaded not guilty. On December 27, 1996, the Regional Trial Court convicted the four individuals of double murder, sentencing them to reclusion perpetua and ordering payment of damages to the victims' heirs. Appeals were subsequently filed by Sanchez and Averion.

Events Leading to the Crime

On April 13, 1991, the day of the incident, witness Vivencio Malabanan, a policeman and part of Sanchez’s security team, was informed by Peradillas about the possibility of a birthday party attended by Nelson PeAalosa, a political opponent. This led to an alleged conspiracy culminated in a planned ambush against the PeAalosas.

Execution of the Crime

Around 7:45 PM, the accused followed Nelson PeAalosa's vehicle, purportedly armed with automatic weapons. According to witness testimonies, including that of Malabanan, the accused fired multiple rounds at PeAalosa's jeep, resulting in both Nelson and his son Rickson sustaining fatal injuries.

Investigation and Autopsy

Following the shooting, law enforcement authorities arrived at the crime scene and retrieved the victims’ bodies. An autopsy conducted by Dr. Ruben B. Escueta confirmed death due to gunshot wounds. Ballistic tests linked empty shell casings at the scene to weapons associated with the accused.

Defense Strategy and Testimonies

The accused presented a defense of alibi, denying involvement in the crime and positing that they were being scapegoated for refusing to testify against Mayor Sanchez in a separate case. A cross-examination revealed inconsistencies between testimonies of the defense and witness accounts regarding the actions of Malabanan during the shooting.

Trial Court's Ruling

The trial court found that the prosecution had established the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt, highlighting the planning, execution, and conspiracy surrounding the murders. The court emphasized the presence of treachery and evident premeditation in its ruling and sentenced the accused accordingly.

Appeal Arguments

On appeal, Sanchez and Averion argued that the trial court failed to properly assess the inconsistencies between testimonies, particularly those of Malabanan and the autopsy findings. They contested the credibility of the witness based on these disparities and sought to undermine the prosecution's case.

Supreme Court Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's conviction but clarified that the complex crime of double murder was not applicable as the shootings constituted multiple acts due to the use of automatic weapons. The court emphasized that each shot fired represented a separate and distinct act of m

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.