Title
People vs. San Juan
Case
G.R. No. L-2997
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1951
Lamberto San Juan, accused of treason during WWII, was convicted for aiding Japanese soldiers in pursuing guerrillas, as corroborated by two witnesses. Minor discrepancies in testimonies did not undermine the evidence. Counts 2, 8, and 10 were dismissed due to insufficient proof under the two-witness rule. The Supreme Court affirmed his guilt under count 1, imposing reclusion perpetua and a fine.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-2997)

Summary of Charges and Evidence

The information against San Juan included eleven counts of treason; however, his conviction was based solely on counts 1, 2, 8, and 10. Count 1 revolved around events that occurred in December 1943, during a period described as an amnesty. The prosecution's evidence indicated that a group of individuals, including Vivencio Panganiban and Rustico Cabasco, met to discuss guerrilla activities. Upon learning that the Japanese were approaching, San Juan went to a Japanese garrison and returned with four armed Japanese soldiers. He later attacked guerrillas, resulting in their flight.

Testimony and Evidence Evaluation

Witnesses Gerundio Villanisa and Rustico Cabasco provided testimony that supported the prosecution's claim. There was a noted discrepancy between their accounts, with Villanisa stating that San Juan went directly to the Japanese garrison, while Cabasco only mentioned seeing San Juan with the Japanese without detailing his trip to the garrison. However, this discrepancy was characterized as more apparent than real, as both testimonies collectively established that San Juan collaborated with the Japanese forces against local guerrillas.

Application of the Two-Witness Rule

The appellate counsel argued that counts 2, 8, and 10 lacked sufficient corroboration, adhering to the two-witness rule required in treason cases. Nevertheless, the court found count 1 alone sufficient to affirm San Juan's conviction. His actions showed implied adherence to the enemy, notably through his armed collaboration and acknowledgment of leaving Lopez with the Japanese troops.

Sentencing and Legal Conformity

The penalty of reclusion perpetua was deemed appropriate by the trial court, as the circumstances of the case presented neither mitigating nor aggravating factors. The Constitutional frame

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.