Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Sali y Alawaddin
Case
G.R. No. 236596
Decision Date
Jan 29, 2020
Mustafa Sali charged under drug laws for selling/possessing shabu; courts initially convicted, but Supreme Court acquitted due to broken custody chain, procedural non-compliance, and reasonable doubt.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 236596)

Factual Background

Mustafa Sali was charged on July 5, 2010, with violating Sections 5 and 11, Article II of R.A. No. 9165, for the sale and possession of methamphetamine hydrochloride, commonly known as shabu. On June 21, 2010, he was apprehended by members of the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) during a buy-bust operation. A confidential informant had reported his drug-selling activities, leading to a plan to execute the operation where Sali was identified as the seller.

Prosecution's Evidence

During the operation, Sali sold one heat-sealed plastic sachet containing methamphetamine to PDEA agent Michael C. Lanza, who acted as a poseur-buyer. Following the transaction, agents arrested Sali after Lanza signaled, and further searches yielded additional drugs, money, and other items. The prosecution produced three witnesses to establish the events and the drug's presence, including documentation and laboratory results confirming the substance's identity as shabu.

Defense's Claims

Sali, in his defense, argued that he was at a family event during the time of his arrest and did not engage in drug activities. He claimed that he was forcibly taken by armed individuals who lacked proper identification. He also alleged police extortion attempts during interrogation and denied the validity of the evidence presented against him.

RTC Ruling

The RTC found Sali guilty of both charges, sentencing him to life imprisonment for the sale of shabu and a 12 to 20-year term for possession, along with fines. The RTC asserted that the prosecution had established a clear chain of custody for the seized drugs.

CA Ruling

On appeal, the CA affirmed the RTC's decision, emphasizing that the chain of custody remained intact and that the elements of illegal possession were convincingly demonstrated. Sali's arguments regarding the inadequacy of the evidence were dismissed, and the court held that the markings and procedural compliance were sufficient under the law.

Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court found the appeal meritorious and reversed the previous convictions. It emphasized that for a conviction on illegal drug sales, the prosecution must prove the identity of both the buyer and seller, the object of the sale, and the delivery of the drug, all beyond reasonable doubt. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a credible chain of custody for the sachets of shabu.

Chain of Custody Analysis

The court clarified the legal requirements for maintaining a chain of custody as outlined in R.A. No. 9165 and its regulations. It noted that the physical inventory and documentati

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.