Title
People vs. Salem
Case
G.R. No. 118946
Decision Date
Oct 16, 1997
A 1994 rape case where Rico Salem was acquitted as the Supreme Court found insufficient evidence of force or intimidation, citing inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and a plausible consensual relationship.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-48140)

Charges and Conviction

Rico Salem was found guilty of rape, resulting in a sentence of reclusion perpetua, including accessory penalties, and an order to indemnify Marisol D. Sabellano the amount of P50,000. The conviction was based primarily on Marisol's testimony regarding the allegation.

Testimony of the Complainant

Marisol testified that on the evening of the incident, she was accosted by Rico while on her way to buy sugar. Despite being in a well-lit area, she claimed that he forcibly pulled her to a grassy area, removed her clothing, and raped her while threatening her life. Following the assault, she was found by a group of individuals who helped her return home.

Defense by the Accused

Rico Salem admitted to having had sexual relations with Marisol but maintained that they were consensual and had been in a romantic relationship since May 21, 1994. He contended that the encounter was consensual and presented witnesses claiming to have seen Marisol and Rico together that evening, appearing happy and unbothered.

Analysis of Evidence

The court identified two critical elements constituting rape: carnal knowledge and the use of force or intimidation. The prosecution asserted that the latter was present due to Marisol's claim of being threatened by Rico. The credibility of Marisol's testimony was scrutinized in light of the requirements for proving rape, which demanded a higher standard given the nature of the crime.

Credibility of Complainant's Testimony

Upon analysis, the court noted inconsistencies in Marisol's account, particularly regarding her ability to identify Rico as her assailant in a well-lit environment and her actions during the encounter. Her failure to shout for help or seek assistance from nearby houses raised questions about the validity of her claims of intimidation.

Examination of Physical Evidence

Medical examination revealed abrasions on Marisol's body, which she could not adequately explain. The defense proposed that these injuries could have been inflicted by Marisol's parents, rejecting the notion that they were caused during the alleged assault.

Witness Testimonies and Their Impact

Witnesses called by Rico, including trisikad drivers, testified that they observed him and Marisol appearing happy and laughing together on the night of the incident. These findings contradicted the narrative of a forced encounter and suggested a consensual relationship.

Presumption of Innocence and Conclusion

The burden of proof lies with the prosecution to establish guilt beyond a reasonable

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.