Title
People vs. Sagario
Case
G.R. No. L-18659
Decision Date
Jun 29, 1965
Armed raid on Molave Municipal Building led by Luis Gui-e and Antipas Sagario results in double murder of policemen; dying declaration implicates accused; conspiracy, treachery, and premeditation proven; Supreme Court affirms death penalty.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 170589)

Charges and Trial Background

The defendants were charged with double murder in an information dated November 6, 1956, at the Court of First Instance of Zamboanga del Sur. Following a trial, the Court found Sagario and Gui-e guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, qualifying their crime with evident premeditation and aggravating circumstances, including treachery and nighttime. Both were sentenced to death and were ordered to indemnify the heirs of Patrolman Paulino Ursais and Patrolman Jose Gomez, who were killed in the incident.

Key Events Leading to the Crime

On September 3, 1956, multiple persons, including Luis Gui-e and Antipas Sagario, were seen together in a store engaging in suspicious activities. The group later converged in Sagario's bodega, and subsequently, a raid was conducted on the municipal building where the two policemen were stationed. The officers were ambushed upon the arrival of the assailants, resulting in gunfire and the deaths of both Patrolman Ursais and Patrolman Gomez.

Encounter with Law Enforcement

Patrolman Ursais was on guard duty and was replaced by Patrolman Gomez at midnight. Shortly after Gomez took over, a group of armed men arrived, and he was threatened and shot by the assailants. The events that transpired were marked by panic, with Gomez attempting to escape after being shot. Accounts of the raid illustrate a coordinated and violent attack against the police presence in the area.

Dying Declarations and Statements

The dying declarations of Patrolman Gomez were key to the prosecution's case against Sagario and Gui-e. The first declaration was made in the presence of Chief of Police Turado and later to Governor Ebarle at the hospital, where Gomez identified his assailants. His statements were crucial as they directly implicated identified defendants while describing the circumstances of the violent raid.

Evidence of Conspiracy

The court examined various elements, including the history of conflict between Sagario, Gui-e, and the local police, which established a motive for the attack. The relationship between the accused and the police, coupled with their coordinated arrival at the scene of the crime, suggested a conspiracy to kill the officers, thereby qualifying the crime under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code.

Defense and Alibi

Gui-e's defense rested on the assertion that he was not present at the crime scene during the attack. He provided an alibi claiming he was at Camp VII during the time of the murders. However, the proximity of the camp to the municipal building undermined his defense, as the distance could be covered in a short period, allowing for the possibility of him participating in the raid.

Judicial Findings and Affirmation of Guilt

The court affirmed the admissibility of Gomez's dying declarations, ruling that they met all requisite criteria for such evidence. The statements provided a clear identification of the assailants an

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.