Title
People vs. Robles
Case
G.R. No. 101335
Decision Date
Jun 8, 2000
Two men convicted of robbery with homicide after confessing to ransacking a house, resulting in two deaths; court upheld their guilt based on admissible confessions and circumstantial evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 163756)

Facts

The case stems from an incident on January 30, 1987, involving the robbery and double homicide of two household helpers in the home of Jose Macalino in Makati. Patrol officers conducting a routine inspection apprehended Oscar Robles and Antonio Manas, who were passengers in a taxicab. Upon questioning, Robles confessed to participating in the robbery, revealing that items taken from the Macalino residence were found in their possession. The police subsequently discovered the victims' bodies at the crime scene, corroborating the allegations against the accused.

Charges and Proceedings

Robles and Manas were charged with Robbery with Double Homicide. The prosecution's case included the extrajudicial confessions of both defendants, where they implicated each other in the homicide. The trial proceeded with both accused insisting they had not participated in the murders, leading to an eventual guilty verdict for conspiracy to commit the robbery with homicide based on established evidence.

Legal Arguments

Robles contended that his extrajudicial confession should be deemed inadmissible due to alleged coercion and lack of effective assistance of counsel. He also argued that circumstantial evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt. The prosecution, however, maintained that the confessions were valid and substantiated by surrounding circumstances and physical evidence obtained at the scene.

Decision on the Admissibility of Evidence

The court held that the extrajudicial confessions were admissible, supported by the presence of counsel during the investigation and trial. The trial court noted that Robles did not raise any claims of intimidation at the time the confessions were made. The evidence against him included corroborating testimony and physical evidence linking him to the crime, which collectively established his involvement.

Circumstantial Evidence and Conviction

The court found sufficient circumstantial evidence to uphold Robles's conviction. The evidence suggested that he was complicit in the robbery as a lookout and participated in the looting. Important to note was the principle that when homicide occurs during a robbery, all participants in the crime can be charged as principals, even if they did not directly commit the act of killing.

Sentencing

Robles was sentenced to reclusion perpetua, with the court affirming this penalty while increasing the indemnity to the vic

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.