Title
People vs. Roa
Case
G.R. No. 138195-96
Decision Date
Jul 10, 2003
Nicanor Roa convicted of raping a 14-year-old twice in 1997; Supreme Court upheld reclusion perpetua per count, awarding damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 138195-96)

Factual Background

On May 25 and July 29, 1997, AAA was raped by Nicanor Roa, who entered her room armed with a bladed weapon during both incidents. The first incident occurred when AAA was asleep with her mentally challenged brother in the room. The appellant threatened her, removed her clothing, and sexually assaulted her. The second incident followed a similar pattern, with Roa again threatening AAA to prevent her from screaming. Physical examinations conducted later indicated that AAA was 15 to 16 weeks pregnant as a result of the assaults.

Procedural History

Nicanor Roa was charged through two separate informations filed on August 4, 1997, under Criminal Case Nos. 6294-V-97 and 6295-V-97. During his arraignment on August 15, 1997, he pleaded not guilty, leading to a joint trial that presented evidence from both the prosecution and the defense.

Evidence Presented

The prosecution established a prima facie case through the testimony of AAA, who consistently detailed the events of both assaults, including her emotional state and the threats made by Roa. The testimony indicated that AAA felt pain and fear during the assaults, corroborated by physical examination findings of lacerations consistent with sexual assault. Roa's defense was primarily based on an alibi and attempted discreditation of AAA's testimony, claiming inconsistency regarding her pregnancy timeline.

Appellant’s Claims and Court’s Analysis

Roa contested the credibility of AAA's testimony, arguing that the circumstances of her being asleep and subsequently assaulted were implausible. Nevertheless, the Court found no merit in these claims, determining that AAA’s testimony was convincing and aligned with the nature of her trauma. Despite prior pregnancy acknowledgment, the Court maintained that this did not undermine the validity of her claims regarding the assaults.

Verdict and Sentencing

The Regional Trial Court found Nicanor Roa guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the charges filed against him, imposing the penalty of reclusion perpetua for each count of rape, along with financial compensation of P75,000. However, upon review, adjustments were made to the civil indemnity and damages awarded. The appellate Court modified the decision to align with prevailing juri

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.