Title
People vs. Resurreccion
Case
G.R. No. 185389
Decision Date
Jul 7, 2009
Benjie, a domestic helper, convicted of raping 11-year-old AAA despite absence of spermatozoa or lacerations; victim's credible testimony upheld, reclusion perpetua imposed.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 185389)

Background of Charge

On June 20, 2001, Benjie Resurreccion was formally charged with Simple Rape under Article 266-A of the Revised Penal Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 8353. The incident occurred on December 5, 2000, where it was alleged that Benjie, acting as a domestic helper for AAA's family, forcibly had sexual intercourse with the 11-year-old girl, making the accusations serious given the victim's age.

Proceedings and Initial Verdict

Benjie was arraigned on October 2, 2001, where he pleaded not guilty. During pre-trial, the prosecution established the victim's age and recounted how the events unfolded on the day of the incident, including detailed testimony from AAA, her aunt BBB, and a medical professional. Following these proceedings, the RTC found Benjie guilty on August 30, 2005, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua and ordering him to pay P50,000 as damages.

Appeal to the Court of Appeals

Benjie appealed the RTC decision, arguing procedural irregularities and disputing the credibility of the victim’s testimony. The Court of Appeals, on March 24, 2008, affirmed the RTC's decision with modifications, specifically increasing the damages to P50,000 for civil indemnity and an additional P50,000 for moral damages.

Key Legal Issues

The case highlighted several legal principles regarding rape accusations, particularly the evidentiary requirements and the credibility of witnesses. It reiterated that the essence of statutory rape is simply the carnal knowledge of a woman under the age of twelve years, regardless of consent or force.

Assessment of Evidence

The RTC and the Court of Appeals based their decisions substantially on AAA's credible testimony. The victim convincingly recounted the events leading to her assault, describing Benjie’s threats and the ensuing violation. Despite the medical examination showing no lacerations or sperm presence in it, the absence of these findings was not sufficient to undermine the prosecution's case given AAA's clear narrative of the assault. Medical testimony established that such conditions could

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.