Title
People vs. Regalario y Villagracia
Case
G.R. No. 101451
Decision Date
Mar 23, 1993
A student, Menardo Garcia, was fatally stabbed by six assailants near his school in 1986. The Supreme Court upheld their murder conviction, reducing penalties for minors and affirming conspiracy, premeditation, and abuse of superior strength.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 101451)

Factual Background

On September 18, 1986, Menardo Garcia was attacked by the accused while walking home from school. The six accused approached Garcia and initiated a confrontation, during which Carlos Pabillar punched him and commanded the others to attack Garcia. Regalario subsequently stabbed Garcia, leading to a fatal injury. The incident unfolded in a well-lit area, and witnesses, including Romano Padillo and Glenda Osabal, identified the assailants.

Judicial Proceedings

During the trial, Regalario and Pabillar initially pleaded not guilty but later changed their pleas to guilty before the prosecution rested its case. The trial court found all accused guilty of murder under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code and imposed a sentence of Reclusion Perpetua, along with financial obligations to the victim’s heirs.

Issues Raised on Appeal

The appellants contended that the trial court erred in rejecting their notice of appeal as it was filed late, in accepting their guilty pleas without proper explanation of the charge, and in relying primarily on the testimonies of prosecution witnesses while dismissing defense testimonies. They also claimed the trial court did not consider their minority as a mitigating circumstance.

Decision on Appeal

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's conviction. It ruled that the notice of appeal was indeed filed late and that the appellants had not raised timely objections or concerns regarding their pleas during the trial. The court further found the evidence presented by the prosecution credible and substantial, particularly emphasizing the existence of a conspiracy among the accused.

Mitigation of Penalty

While the court acknowledged the claims of minority presented by Regalario and Pabillar, it noted that the evidence did not sufficiently prove their ages to warrant mitigating circumstances. However, it recognized that Rolan

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.