Title
People vs. Razonable
Case
G.R. No. 128085-87
Decision Date
Apr 12, 2000
A father convicted of raping his 12-year-old daughter in 1987; Supreme Court upheld the conviction, citing victim’s credible testimony and rejecting alibi defense.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 128085-87)

Charges and Context of Offense

Benjamin Razonable was charged with three counts of rape against his daughter, Maria Fe Razonable, with the allegations indicating the incidents occurred in the year 1987. Each charge detailed that Maria Fe was subjected to forcible carnal knowledge against her will, with the allegation of a relationship heightening the severity of the crimes.

Details of the Incidents

The first incident occurred during the middle of June 1987 when Maria Fe, then 12 years old, was in her room. Her father forced himself upon her, covering her mouth and inflicting violence in the progression of the act. Similar occurrences transpired on subsequent nights, with Razonable threatening her with death should she disclose these events. Maria Fe only reported her father's actions to her elder sister in February 1993, motivated by growing fear of further assaults.

Defense and Testimony

The defense of Razonable relied on alibi and denial, asserting that during the alleged times, he was working at a bakery. A witness supported this claim; however, inconsistencies arose during cross-examination revealing gaps in his account. Razonable also attempted to suggest that Maria Fe had ulterior motives for her accusations, citing his disciplinary actions as a potential reason for her claims.

Judgment and Rationale

The trial court found Razonable guilty on all counts, emphasizing the gravity of the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator as an aggravating circumstance. The defense’s arguments focusing on the vagueness of the dates in the information were rejected because Razonable failed to raise such claims appropriately during the trial. The court noted that the circumstances surrounding the threat of violence and the familial relationship created an environment of intimidation that severely impacted Maria Fe’s ability to act.

Credibility of the Victim

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the trial court's findings that Maria Fe's credibility was intact and bolstered, considering the deep emotional trauma a victim of incest faces. Factors such as the nature of the familial relationship and the psychological domination exerted by Razonable were acknowledged as critical in establishing Maria Fe’s ordeal.

Legal Framework

The decision was grounded in the 1987 Philippine Constitution and applicable laws that pertain to the definition and prosecution of rape, considering aggravating circumstances inherent in the relationship between the victim and the accused. The penalties defined included reclusion perpetua for each count of rape, alongside moral damages.

Adjustments on Damages Awarded

While affirming the convictions, the Supreme Court modified the

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.