Title
People vs. Rabao
Case
G.R. No. 46530
Decision Date
Apr 10, 1939
Defendant convicted of parricide after punching wife, causing spleen rupture and death; mitigating factors led to reduced penalty of reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 46530)

Facts of the Case

The events leading to the conviction indicate that Catalino Rabao and Salvacion Agawa were happily married since January 15, 1936, and had a child. On the morning of the incident, following a late night due to local elections, Rabao argued with his wife regarding bathing their sick child, which escalated into physical violence when he punched her in the abdomen. Agawa fell and subsequently died from a ruptured spleen attributed to the blow delivered by her husband. An autopsy performed by Dr. Vicente Roxas confirmed the cause of death as internal hemorrhage due to the spleen's rupture.

Legal Proceedings

Following the incident, Rabao was charged with parricide. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony, notably from Urbano Rellora, who witnessed the assault, as well as the corroborative findings from the autopsy. The defense argued that Rabao’s actions amounted to reckless imprudence rather than parricide, challenging the assertion that his blow directly resulted in the fatal injury.

Court's Analysis

The court determined that there was no error in the lower court's finding that Rabao's actions were intentional and led to his wife's death. Contrary to the defense's claims, the evidence firmly supported the conclusion that Rabao’s blow was not an act of reckless imprudence but a deliberate violent act that violated the provisions of the Revised Penal Code. The lower court's ruling was reinforced by the credibility of the witnesses, particularly the testimony of Rellora and the autopsy results.

Sentencing and Mitigating Factors

While parricide under Article 246 of the Revised Penal Code typically carries the penalty of reclusion perpetua to death, the court recognized mitigating circumstances in Rabao's case such as the lack of intent to commit such a grave crime, an impulsive reaction due to passion, and his voluntary surrender to authorities after the commission of the crime. Consequently, the appellate decision modified the original sentencing to impose the lesser penalty of reclusion p

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.