Title
People vs. Rabanes
Case
G.R. No. 93709
Decision Date
May 8, 1992
Accused-appellant Joseph Rabanes convicted of raping Angelina Naallatan in 1989; force, intimidation, and injuries corroborated her testimony. Consensual claim rejected; intoxication defense dismissed. Reclusion perpetua imposed; exemplary damages deleted.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 93709)

Charges and Allegations

Joseph Rabanes was charged with the crime of rape based on a sworn complaint filed by Angelina Naallatan on October 26, 1989. The information stated that on September 15, 1989, Rabanes, through force and intimidation, successfully had carnal knowledge of Naallatan against her will, in violation of Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code.

Proceedings and Evidence

During the trial, both parties presented evidence. The prosecution's account detailed that on September 15, 1989, Naallatan, while returning from her brother-in-law's house, was accosted by Rabanes. He reportedly threatened her with violence, causing her to lose consciousness, after which he raped her. Naallatan testified that she regained consciousness to find Rabanes assaulting her. Evidence included her torn clothing and medical examinations showing bruises and abrasions that corroborated her claims.

Witness Testimonies

Several witnesses supported Naallatan's testimony, including:

  • Belen Paclar, Naallatan's sister-in-law, who observed her distressed state and helped report the crime.
  • Barangay Kagawad Roman Ibajay, who confirmed Naallatan's testimony regarding her appearance post-incident.
  • Felicito Cabasan, who saw Rabanes attacking Naallatan and heard her cries for help.

Defense and Counterarguments

Rabanes testified that his relationship with Naallatan was consensual, claiming they engaged in sexual acts for a fee, which she allegedly agreed to. However, his account faced scrutiny due to its implausibility, especially considering Naallatan's immediate report to her relatives and her desperate state upon arrival.

Trial Court's Decision

On May 9, 1990, the trial court found Rabanes guilty of rape and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua, along with ordering him to pay damages to Naallatan for moral damages, exemplary damages, and litigation expenses.

Appeals and Assignments of Error

Rabanes appealed the conviction, asserting:

  1. The trial court erred in finding that he used force and intimidation.
  2. The court credited Naallatan's inconsistent testimony.
  3. The consideration of his previous criminal case was unjustified.
  4. His intoxication should have been regarded as a mitigating factor.

Analysis of the Appeal

The appellate court dismissed Rabanes' claims. It upheld the trial court’s findings regarding the use of force, noting that injuries corroborated Naallatan's narrative. The absence of facial injuries did not undermine the credibility of her account or the occurrence of rape, as demonstrated in precedents that do not require physical signs for conviction. The appellate court also found no merit in the supposed inconsistencies in testimony, noting that they did not detract from the overall credibility of the victim.

Previous Criminal Record and Intoxicatio

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.