Title
People vs. Quimzon
Case
G.R. No. 133541
Decision Date
Apr 14, 2004
Marlo Casiong was fatally stabbed outside a dance hall after Salvacion lured him; Ricky Quimzon denied involvement but convicted based on eyewitness testimony.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 188283)

Procedural History

An information was filed against Quimzon and three others for murder on July 28, 1992. Quimzon surrendered to authorities on August 18, 1994, was arraigned on September 28, 1994, and pleaded not guilty. The prosecution's case centered around the testimony of Emolyn Casiong, the victim’s sister, who was a crucial eyewitness to the events leading to her brother’s death.

Evidence Presented by the Prosecution

The prosecution established that on the night of the incident, while attending a dance, Marlo bumped into Quimzon, which led to a confrontation. Testimony revealed that after stepping outside the dance hall at the invitation of a female acquaintance, Marlo was attacked by Canoto and Edgardo, followed by Quimzon, who stabbed him further. Emolyn Casiong recounted that she witnessed the stabbing and attempted to get help, resulting in Marlo being taken to the hospital, where he died shortly after. Eyewitness accounts and the aggressive attack characterized by surprise and multiple assailants portrayed a coordinated attack.

Defense of Alibi

Quimzon's defense relied on an alibi, asserting he was at a different dance 18 kilometers away during the crime. He denied knowing the other accused and claimed he only learned of Marlo’s death later. This defense was supported by testimonies from witnesses affirming his presence at the distant location. However, such a defense is typically weak, especially against positive identification by eyewitnesses.

Analysis of Corpus Delicti

Quimzon contended that the prosecution failed to establish the corpus delicti, which is essential for a murder conviction. He argued that the testimony of Dr. Adelaida Asperin regarding the autopsy was hearsay, as Dr. Amparo Villanueva conducted it and was deceased before the trial. Nevertheless, the court clarified that proving the corpus delicti does not solely depend on an autopsy report but may include credible witness accounts affirming the fact of death and the wrongful act leading to it.

Credibility of Witness Testimony

It was argued that Emolyn's failure to provide an affidavit during the preliminary investigation and her delayed testimony undermined her credibility. The court, however, noted that her testimony was consistent and compelling despite minor inconsistencies, thus affirming her reliability. Emolyn explained the circumstances of her delayed appearance, including police statements regarding her ability to testify as a family member of the victim.

Findings on Treachery and Liability

The appellate court agreed that treachery was present in the killing, as Marlo was ambushed without warning, preventing him from defending himself. The court indicated that the attack's execution displayed a calculated plan by the accused that ensured the victim's death without risking their safety.

Penalt

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster, building context before diving into full texts. AI-powered analysis, always verify critical details.