Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Petalino
Case
G.R. No. 213222
Decision Date
Sep 24, 2018
Accused stabbed victim during a casual encounter; treachery unproven, conviction downgraded to homicide. Eyewitness testimony outweighed denial and alibi.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 213222)

Background of the Case

On February 19, 1998, an information was filed against Petalino alleging that he, armed with a knife and with treachery and evident premeditation, stabbed Johnny Nalangay, resulting in the victim's death due to injuries sustained. The Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Iloilo City found the accused guilty of murder based on eyewitness testimony and other evidentiary factors.

Prosecution's Version

The prosecution presented eyewitness Franklin Bariquit, who testified that he and the victim were leaving a party when they encountered the accused. Bariquit observed the accused stab Nalangay unexpectedly from behind. He described the victim's desperate attempt to escape and subsequent collapse after running a short distance. Though the victim managed to speak before losing consciousness, he later succumbed to his injuries in the hospital. The victim's father, Jaime Nalangay, testified regarding the emotional and financial impact of his son’s death.

Defense's Version

In contrast, Petalino denied the charges, claiming that he was initially involved in a verbal altercation with Nalangay after inadvertently bumping into him. He asserted that he acted in self-defense when Nalangay drew a knife, claiming they wrestled for control of the weapon before he fled the scene out of fear of being attacked by the victim’s friends.

Judgment of the RTC

On January 24, 2013, the RTC convicted Petalino of murder and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. The court ordered him to pay various damages to the victim's heirs, specifying amounts for indemnity, moral damages, exemplary damages, and temperate damages.

Appeals Process

Petalino appealed the decision, arguing that the prosecution did not establish his guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the circumstances of the crime did not support the claim of treachery. On April 24, 2014, the Court of Appeals upheld the RTC's decision, finding that the inconsistencies in Bariquit's testimony were minor and did not undermine his credibility. The appellate court affirmed the presence of treachery, noting that the manner of the attack denied the victim an opportunity to defend himself.

Supreme Court's Ruling

Upon review, the Supreme Court found merit in the appeal concerning the appreciation of treachery. According to Article 14, paragraph 16 of the Revised Penal Code, treachery requires that the attack must be executed in a manner that ensures the accused faces no risk from the victim's defense. The Court determined that the requirements for proving tre

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.