Title
People vs. Peralta y Dasuga
Case
G.R. No. L-61870
Decision Date
Nov 5, 1982
A 17-year-old was raped by three men, including Constantino Peralta, who was convicted based on credible testimony, medical evidence, and positive identification, despite his alibi defense. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, imposing reclusion perpetua.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-61870)

Trial and Initial Rulings

Following a trial at the Court of First Instance of Isabela, Constantino Peralta was found guilty as charged, while Antolin Pua was acquitted due to insufficient evidence. Peralta was sentenced to seventeen years, four months, and one day of reclusion temporal, as well as ordered to pay damages. The trial court's decision was appealed by Peralta to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals upheld the conviction but found the sentence imposed by the trial court to be erroneous. Notably, the court cited that the applicable law at the time of the crime classified rape committed under such circumstances as punishable by reclusion perpetua to death, as per Republic Acts No. 2632 and No. 4111, thus rendering the trial court's sentence incorrect.

Evidence Presented

The essential facts presented in the case indicate that Thelma Agustin, at the age of seventeen, was waylaid and raped by Peralta and Pua. Thelma recognized the accused during the assault and sustained physical injuries as confirmed by medical examination. Upon regaining consciousness following the assault, she was found in a disheveled state, which corroborated her testimony regarding the events of the evening.

Testimonies

The testimonies from both Thelma Agustin and corroborating witnesses indicated that she had previously met Peralta just days before the incident, which strengthened the identification of the accused. Upon regaining consciousness, Thelma immediately communicated the details of the assault to her aunt and later to her parents, leading to the immediate reporting of the crime to local authorities.

Defense's Position

Peralta and Pua denied the allegations, claiming an alibi that they were together at a restaurant during the time of the crime. However, their defense was undermined by testimonies from witnesses that were inconsistent, particularly with regard to the timeline established by the prosecution.

Rulings on Credibility

The court placed significant weight on the credibility of Thelma's testimony. It concluded that the details regarding her identification of Constantino Peralta were consistent and reliable, undermining the defense's assertions of mistaken identity. The court emphasized the necessity

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.