Title
People vs. Peralta
Case
G.R. No. L-19069
Decision Date
Oct 29, 1968
Three inmates murdered in 1958 New Bilibid Prisons gang riot; OXO gang members convicted of conspiracy, quasi-recidivism, and multiple death penalties.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-19069)

Key Dates and Applicable Law

Decision Date: October 29, 1968
Constitution: 1935 Philippine Constitution
Penal Statutes: Revised Penal Code (Common-Design Conspiracy, Murder provisions, Quasi-Recidivism aggravation)

Facts of the Bilibid Prison Riot and Murders

On February 16, 1958, rival inmates of two gangs (“Sigue-Sigue” predominantly Tagalog and “OXO” predominantly Visayan/Mindanao) clashed during Sunday mass preparations. After an initial fight in the plaza and a thwarted incursion by the Sigue-Sigue from Building 1 into Building 4, members of the OXO in Brigade 4-A forcibly broke locks of adjacent brigades (4-B, 4-C, 4-D) and systematically isolated and killed three Tagalog inmates: Carriego in 4-B, then Barbosa and Cruz in 4-C and near a fire escape. All victims died of multiple stab and club wounds.

Procedural History

• Information filed for multiple murder with aggravating circumstances against 22 inmates; six (including the six respondents) survived pre-trial and trial dismissals and acquittals.
• Lower court convicted Peralta, Factora, Dosal, Parumog, Larita, Luna of murder with treachery, band, superior strength, and other aggravations, sentencing each to death and indemnity.
• Parties appealed via automatic review.

Eyewitness Testimony and Identification

Successive inmate witnesses (Pineda, Marayoc, Sauza, Fontillas, Pabarlan, Halili, Espino) consistently identified Factora, Peralta, Dosal, Parumog, Larita, Luna as armed aggressors who clubbed and stabbed the three victims while victims were defenseless or pleading for mercy. Physical injuries and medical testimony confirmed multiple fatal wounds.

Defendants’ Invoked Defenses

• Peralta and Dosal claimed self-defense, alleging initial attacks by victims.
• Parumog, Larita, Luna asserted alibi, stating they were under investigation or remained in their cells throughout the riot.
Trial court found these defenses unworthy of belief given strong, consistent eyewitness identification and lack of documentary evidence for alibi detentions.

Aggravating Circumstances and Absence of Extenuation

Aggravations: quasi-recidivism (all serving prior sentences), treachery, band, armed persons, superior strength, insult to public authority.
No extenuating circumstance proved or alleged. Under Article 160 RPC, maximum penalties apply to quasi-recidivists.

Existence and Significance of Conspiracy

Although no overt prior meeting was shown, the deliberate selection and sequential killing of victims of one gang by members of another, armed preparation, and coordinated movement among brigades demonstrate an implied conspiracy. Conspiracy here is inferred from:

  1. Targeting only Tagalog inmates known as Sigue-Sigue;
  2. Collective arming and synchronized incursions;
  3. Participation of the same defendants in each killing.

Doctrine on Conspiracy and Collective Liability

• Conspiracy (Art. 8 RPC) is not itself punishable but, once crime is committed, renders all conspirators co-principals.
• All con

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.