Title
People vs. Pedres y Buag
Case
G.R. No. 129533
Decision Date
Apr 30, 1999
Antonio Pedres y Buag was convicted of raping his 14-year-old daughter; the Supreme Court upheld the verdict but reduced the penalty to life imprisonment, citing insufficient evidence for the death penalty.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 129533)

Charges and Arraignment

The offense was formally initiated by the Assistant Provincial Prosecutor of Albay, based on Maribel's written complaint, which alleges that the accused, motivated by lewd design and taking advantage of his moral ascendancy as her father, committed sexual intercourse with Maribel without her consent. Upon arraignment, the accused pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Prosecution's Evidence

During the trial, Maribel Pedres testified about the alleged incident, stating that she was abruptly awakened by her father restraining her and subsequently raping her. Testimony from her older sister, Maricel, supported the claims, detailing Maribel's disclosure to her after the event, which led to Maribel being examined by a physician, Dr. Maria Nimfa Joji QuiAones. The medical findings indicated various healed lacerations and physical evidence consistent with sexual assault.

Defense Testimony

The defense presented an alibi to contest the accusations, asserting that the accused was elsewhere during the incident—specifically, in Bagsa, Oas, Albay—from January 4 to January 7, 1996. Testimonies from the accused’s sister, Angelita Bron, and brother-in-law, Norberto Bulacan, supported this alibi. They testified that the accused was working on a ricefield and had no opportunity to commit the crime in Macalidong.

Trial Court's Findings

After evaluating the testimonies and evidence, the trial court determined that the prosecution established the essential elements of rape beyond reasonable doubt. It imposed the death penalty and mandated the accused to provide monetary indemnity to the victim.

Appeal and Argument Points

The accused-appellant raised two principal grounds for appeal: first, the reliance on the complainant's testimony, which he characterized as incredible, and second, the claim that the prosecution failed to meet the burden of proof for conviction beyond reasonable doubt. He argued that details of the incident were inconsistent and implausible, particularly regarding the circumstances surrounding Maribel's physical state and lack of immediate reporting.

Court’s Analysis of Testimony

The appellate court meticulously dissected Maribel's testimony, finding it coherent and consistent despite confrontations about minor discrepancies. The court addressed the behavior of Maribel during the incident, asserting that fear and trauma could inhibit natural reactions during such distressing experiences. The testimony concerning her father's threats further substantiated her failure to report immediately to her mother.

Rejection of Alibi and Final Consideration

The appellate court systematically rejected the alibi defense, stating that it is inherently weak compared to positive identification by the victim. It ruled that the trial court's assessment of the credibility of Maribel's testimony, given her age and the relationship with the accused, wa

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.