Title
People vs. Pascua
Case
G.R. No. 82303
Decision Date
Dec 21, 1989
Magdalena accused stepfather Rodrigo of raping her in 1982 and 1984. Medical findings contradicted her claims, and delays in reporting raised doubts. Supreme Court acquitted Rodrigo due to inconsistencies and lack of credible evidence.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 82303)

Allegations and Initial Proceedings

Rodrigo Pascua was accused of raping Magdalena Cambaleza, who was under twelve years of age at the time of the alleged crime in November 1982. The prosecution alleged that Pascua, armed with a bayonet, forcibly had carnal knowledge of the victim. Magdalena’s narrative included a second incident of sexual assault on March 30, 1984, which added complexity to the case but was not charged in the indictment. Pascua pleaded not guilty during the arraignment on February 20, 1987, and was later found guilty by the trial court, receiving a sentence of reclusion perpetua and a fine of P25,000 for damages to the victim.

Details of the Prosecution's Case

The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of the complainant, Magdalena, who described two incidents of rape: the first in November 1982 by the riverbank in Gabaldon and the second two years later in Nueva Vizcaya. Following her reports to her mother and the medical examination, which confirmed old healed lacerations, the case was pursued in court. The medical certificate indicated that she had lost her virginity, supporting the assertion that sexual activity occurred.

Defense and Testimony of the Accused

Rodrigo Pascua's defense focused on denying the allegations, attributing them to familial strife and personal animosities, particularly revolving around his relationship with Agnes. He presented a narrative whereby Agnes became involved with a barangay captain, which he claimed fueled animosity against him, potentially motivating false accusations from Magdalena. He further disputed the credibility of the allegations, noting delays in reporting the incidents and inconsistencies in the testimonies presented.

Credibility Issues and Inconsistencies

A critical aspect of the court's evaluation involved assessing the credibility of Magdalena and her mother's accounts. Several inconsistencies emerged, such as contradictions regarding the timeline of events, the interactions with the accused post-alleged incidents, and the nature of their living arrangements. Notably, Agnes's continued residence with Pascua after the alleged assaults raised questions about the urgency of the accusations.

Medical Evidence and Its Implications

The medical examination revealed that Magdalena was still a virgin at the time of the examination in 1984, despite her claims of previous assaults. This evidence cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative, particularly reg

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.