Title
People vs. Paredes
Case
G.R. No. L-19149
Decision Date
Aug 16, 1968
A 1960 robbery-homicide case involving the killing of Chua Nai Su, planned by a group including police chief Protasio Santos, with conspiracy proven and alibis rejected.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-19149)

Incident Overview

On April 26, 1960, Chua Nai Su was shot inside a pickup truck shortly after leaving the Insular-Yebana Tobacco Corporation warehouse in Barrio Palattao, Naguilian. His driver fled the scene, and Chua was subsequently found dead near the company gate. The attackers were seen fleeing in the same pickup truck used by Nana Su. Following the crime, arrests were made and subsequent investigations led to the filing of related charges against multiple defendants.

Arrest and Investigation

Investigations were initiated shortly after the incident. Conrado de Leon, a key figure, was arrested on April 27, leading to the arrest of other co-conspirators, including Ruben Concepcion, Manuel Mamuri, and Ben Paredes, who was implicated by confessions given by other accused. The complexity of the case escalated with the filing of separate informations for various defendants, consolidating into Criminal Case No. 2702.

Testimonies and Evidence

The prosecution relied heavily on testimonies from accomplices, including a plea of guilt by Ruben Concepcion, and corroborating witnesses who provided details on the planning and execution of the robbery. Subsequent accounts detailed meetings between the accused, discussions on the robbery, and an understanding of their roles prior to the crime.

Role of Local Officials

Testimonies revealed that local officials, including Chief of Police Protasio Santos and Pascual Bartolome, had promised rewards for the commission of the crime and discussed plans that indicated they were complicit. This raised significant legal implications regarding their intent and involvement in the full conspiracy to commit robbery and homicide.

Alibi Defense

Appellants Paredes, Santos, and Bartolome presented alibis in their defense, attempting to prove their absence from the crime scene during the event. They argued their activities during the time of the crime established their lack of participation. However, the trial court found their defenses lacking in credibility against the overwhelming evidence of their involvement in a conspiracy.

Credibility of Witnesses

The appeals raised questions about the trustworthiness of the testimonies of the state witnesses due to their status as accomplices. However, the court reaffirmed that corroboration by independent witnesses supported the accusations against Paredes, Santos, and Bartolome, determining their t

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.