Title
People vs. Pajarillo
Case
G.R. No. 143755-58
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2002
A 16-year-old raised by Eduardo Pajarillo accused him of rape; court acquitted him of rape but convicted of acts of lasciviousness for one incident.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 143755-58)

Allegations of Sexual Abuse

Anne Rachel Pajarillo reported that Eduardo sexually assaulted her multiple times, first in 1993 when she was in the third grade, and subsequently on November 5, 10, and 26, 1995. She recounted being forced to engage in sexual acts, describing instances where Eduardo removed her clothing, subdued her physically, and inappropriately touched her. After a period of silence, during which she felt unable to confide in her mother, Anne Rachel eventually disclosed the abuse to her teacher, Mrs. Rose Baja, leading to a medical examination and eventual criminal complaints being filed against Eduardo.

Medical and Expert Testimony

A medical examination conducted by Dr. Danilo P. Ledesma revealed old, healed wounds consistent with penetration but noted that the injuries were not indicative of violent sexual assault, as there was no complete laceration of the hymen. This finding was critical in determining the nature of the allegations and the credibility of the survivor's account.

Defense Strategy

In his defense, Eduardo Pajarillo denied the accusations, asserting an alibi supported by numerous witnesses. Friends and family testified that the Pajarillo home was often filled with visitors on the nights of the alleged assaults, claiming that Anne Rachel was not present during critical times. The defense presented a narrative that painted Anne Rachel as a willful and disobedient child, downplaying the severity of the allegations against Eduardo.

Trial Court's Findings

The Regional Trial Court found Eduardo guilty of multiple counts of rape, imposing harsh sentences, including reclusion perpetua and the death penalty for certain charges, conveying a strong stance against sexual violence. The court emphasized that the prosecution's evidence established Eduardo's guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Appeal and Judicial Scrutiny

On appeal, the court closely examined Anne Rachel's testimony, pinpointing inconsistencies and the use of circumstantial evidence, such as the reliance on her ability to identify Eduardo through smell, which was deemed insufficient. The court applied legal principles that demand rigorous scrutiny when the sole evidence relies on the complainant's testimony, especially when life-altering penalties such as death are at stake.

Acquittal of Rape Charges; Conviction for Acts of Lasciviousness

Upon careful reconsideration, the appellate court distinguished between the charges, finding insufficient evidence to uphold Eduardo's conviction for rape in all but one instance. The court concluded that while

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.