Title
People vs. Ortega, Jr. y Conje
Case
G.R. No. 116736
Decision Date
Jul 24, 1997
Two drunk men stab victim during a drinking session, conceal body in a well; one convicted of homicide, the other acquitted due to legal technicalities.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 92163)

Chronology of Events

  1. A drinking session on the evening of October 15, 1992, at the Ortega residence.
  2. Victim went to relieve himself; Ortega Jr. followed and stabbed him repeatedly.
  3. Witness Diosdado Quitlong and others saw Ortega Jr. stabbing the victim in a canal.
  4. Romeo Ortega, Benjamin Ortega Jr., and Manuel Garcia lifted the still-living victim, dropped him head-first into a well, and heaved stones on top.
  5. Quitlong reported the crime to Col. Leonardo Orig and the police; appellants were arrested.
  6. RTC Valenzuela convicted both appellants of murder (Feb. 9, 1994); appeal taken to the Supreme Court.

Trial Court Verdict and Rationale

  • Convictions: Murder under treachery, premeditation, abuse of superior strength
  • Penalty: Reclusion perpetua each; P35,000 funeral expenses; P50,000 death indemnity
  • Finding: Concerted design to finish off the victim by throwing him alive into a water-filled well

Supreme Court Issues on Appeal

  1. Was there conspiracy among appellants and Romeo Ortega to kill the victim by drowning?
  2. Was the victim still alive when placed in the well?
  3. Should Manuel Garcia be acquitted?
  4. Did Benjamin Ortega Jr.’s act amount to murder or only homicide?

Applicable Law

  • 1987 Constitution, Article III, Section 14(2): Right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation
  • Revised Penal Code:
    • Article 4(1) (praeter intentionem)
    • Article 19(2) and Article 20 (accessories after the fact; exemption of certain relatives)
    • Article 248 (murder) and Article 249 (homicide)

Supreme Court Analysis: Ortega’s Liability

  • Credibility: Trial court’s assessment of eyewitness Quitlong upheld; defense alibi and denial found implausible.
  • Fact-finding: No evidence of treachery or premeditation; abuse of superior strength not established (force used was not grossly disproportionate).
  • Legal Conclusion: Stabbing under the circumstances qualifies as homicide, not murder.

Supreme Court Analysis: Garcia’s Liability

  • Participation: Garcia did not stab; he assisted only in concealing and disposing of the body.
  • Medical Evidence: Autopsy showed muddy particles in airway and stomach—victim was alive when submerged and died of drowning.
  • Praeter Intentionem: Garcia’s concealment felony directly and naturally caused the victim’s death.
  • Constitutional and Statutory Barriers:
    • Information charged only stabbing-murder; charging Garcia for homicide violates his right to be informed (Art. III, Sec. 14(2)).
    • As Ortega Jr.’s brother-in-law, Garcia is exemp
...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.