Title
People vs. Ordono
Case
G.R. No. 132154
Decision Date
Jun 29, 2000
A 15-year-old girl was raped and murdered in 1994. Two men confessed without counsel, later claiming coercion. The Supreme Court ruled their confessions inadmissible due to lack of counsel but upheld their conviction for rape with homicide, imposing death penalties.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 77008)

Facts of the Case

• August 5, 1994 – Decomposing body of Shirley Victore found near Barangay Poblacion bridge; autopsy confirms rape and strangulation.
• Initial police invitation yields no confession; August 10, 1994 – both suspects return voluntarily and admit participation.
• Written extrajudicial confessions recorded, witnessed by non-legal persons; later tape-recorded radio interview conducted at police station.
• Arrests followed; later assistance sought from PAO counsel five to eight days after initial confessions.

Custodial Investigation and Extrajudicial Confessions

• Confessions obtained during custodial questions without counsel present.
• Apprehension of suspects occurred when they “voluntarily” reported, yet interrogation commenced immediately.
• Statements reduced to writing in local dialect, witnesses included civic and religious figures but no lawyer.

Legal Standards on Admissibility of Confession

Under the 1987 Constitution (Art. III, Sec. 12(1)) and implementing laws/jurisprudence, an admissible extrajudicial confession must be:
a. Voluntary
b. Made with assistance of competent, independent counsel
c. Express
d. In writing

Inadmissibility of Accused’s Statements Without Counsel

• Right to counsel attaches immediately upon custodial investigation.
• RA 7438 permits presence of certain non-legal persons only if counsel is absent and a valid waiver is executed; no waiver here.
• Subsequent involvement of PAO counsel and MTC judge in re-signing confessions cannot cure the initial absence of counsel.
• Perfunctory advisements in dialect, stereotyped question-answer format lacked meaningful explanation of rights.

Radio Interview Admissions and Their Admissibility

• Tape-recorded interview by private radio announcer Roland Almoite admitted:
– Original tape unaltered; voices identified; no tampering shown.
– Conducted voluntarily, without police coercion or investigatory character.
• Voluntary statements to private individual fall outside constitutional exclusionary rule targeting state-compelled confessions.

Corroborative Forensic Evidence

• Autopsy report and medico-legal testimony corroborate elements of accused’s narrated acts:
– Contusions on legs and face consistent with boxing; depressed neck mark confirms strangulation.

Allegations of Torture and Inhuman Treatment

• Accused alleged beating, gun-barrel intimidation, hanging, threats during police custody.
• No complaints lodged during radio interview, PAO counsel conference, or judicial validation; medical examination revealed no injuries.
• Court found torture claims unsubstantiated and inferred fabrication.

Alibi Defense and Its Rejection

• Ordoño claimed presence at Barangay Captain’s farm; Medina claimed errands for aunt.
• Barangay Captain testified Ordoño was seen near crime scene; “aunt Resurreccion” not produced.
• A







...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.