Title
People vs. Olazo
Case
G.R. No. 220761
Decision Date
Oct 3, 2016
A group planned and executed a robbery, resulting in the murder of Erlinda Vallecera. Charito Fernandez, involved in planning and aiding the crime, was convicted of Robbery with Homicide, sentenced to reclusion perpetua, and ordered to pay damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 183053)

Procedural Background

This summary follows an appeal filed by Charito Fernandez under Section 13, Rule 124 of the Rules of Court against the Decision of the Court of Appeals that upheld the ruling of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicting Charito of Robbery with Homicide, arising from events occurring on August 8, 2004.

Facts of the Case

On two occasions in July and August 2004, Charito and co-accused Rogelio Lasconia conspired to rob the Valleceras. The plan was to have Dionesia Lasconia, a house help, facilitate access to the victims' home. The initial attempts to rob the house were unsuccessful due to absences and superstitious beliefs. However, on August 8, 2004, the group executed their plan. Dionesia opened the back gate for the masked intruders, Rogelio Lasconia, Eddie Fernandez, and Rommel Escobio. The three quickly subdued the victims and stole valuables, ultimately leading to the murder of Erlinda.

Charges and Legal Proceedings

An Information was lodged against Charito and several others for Robbery with Homicide. Throughout the trial, various plea deals were made, with Dionesia allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge, while evidence presented by state witness Joseph Oronos established Charito's direct involvement in the planning and execution of the crime.

Ruling of the RTC

The RTC convicted Charito and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua, imposing liability for funeral expenses and damages. Charito's appeal followed, claiming insufficient evidence regarding his participation.

Ruling of the Court of Appeals

The Court of Appeals affirmed the RTC’s ruling against Charito, noting that he actively participated in planning, assisting with the robbery, and even threatened their getaway driver. However, the CA acquitted co-accused Eddie Olazo and Miguel Corbis for lack of evidence.

Issues for Resolution

The primary issue presented was whether the RTC erred in convicting Charito based on the available evidence. Charito asserted that the prosecution failed to demonstrate his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the lower courts’ decisions, emphasizing the trial court's unique position in assessing witness credibility. Charito’s involvement was substantiated by direct testimonies and circumstantial evidence which demonstrated conspiracy and conscious participation in the crime.

Legal Principles Applied

The Court highlighted the definition of conspiracy, noting its presence was evidenced not strictly by direct acts but through the collective behaviors of the accused. The testimonies from state witn

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.