Title
People vs. Noguerras y Torres
Case
G.R. No. 76238
Decision Date
Jan 11, 1990
Benjamin Noguerras convicted of Murder for conspiring with Rolando Collado in the stabbing death of Edgardo Escondo, affirmed by the Supreme Court.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 139338)

Charges and Allegations

The Information filed against Noguerras on July 6, 1985, alleged that he, in conspiracy with Rolando Collado, committed murder with evident premeditation and treachery against Edgardo Escondo. The act involved employing personal violence through stabbing, which led to serious and mortal wounds that caused Escondo's death.

Summary of Lower Court Findings

The Regional Trial Court summarized key facts leading to the conviction, establishing that Escondo was a respected figure within the barangay and had connections to both accused due to their involvement in drug-related activities. Tension escalated between Escondo and the accused due to incidents involving gambling debts, theft, and conflicts over their drug business.

Incident on the Day of the Murder

On the fatal day, after a series of escalating conflicts, Escondo was attacked by Rolando Collado while attempting to leave Cecilio Collado’s home. Rolando grabbed Escondo, strangled him, and repeatedly stabbed him using an icepick. Benjamin Noguerras soon entered the scene and also participated in the stabbing. Witnesses included women in the vicinity who pleaded for the attackers to stop but were met with threats.

Medical Evidence and Eyewitness Accounts

Following the attack, Escondo was transported to the hospital where he succumbed to his injuries. The doctor confirmed multiple stab wounds as the cause of death, corroborated by a detailed autopsy report. Eyewitnesses provided sworn statements post-incident, collectively recounting the occurrences and identifying Noguerras as a participant in the crime.

Defense Assertions and Court Analysis

In his defense, Noguerras denied involvement, asserting he was simply responding to cries for help and had no weapon at the time. However, this testimony was uncorroborated and contradicted by the consistent accounts of witnesses, who identified him specifically as an attacker. The court found improvements in the credibility of the eyewitnesses against the appellant's bare denial.

Discrepancies and Testimony Evaluation

Noguerras claimed inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding the type of weapon used. However, the court ruled

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.