Title
People vs. Nierra
Case
G.R. No. L-32624
Decision Date
Feb 12, 1980
Juliana Nierra, a businesswoman, was murdered by hired killer Gaspar Misa, orchestrated by her brother-in-law Paciano Nierra and others to eliminate competition. Misa confessed, implicating all conspirators, leading to convictions and death sentences for some.

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-32624)

Summary of Charges and Proceedings

The appellants, Doblen, Rojas, and the Nierra spouses, were convicted of murder and sentenced to death by Judge Pedro Samson C. Animas of the Court of First Instance of South Cotabato for their roles in the assassination of Juliana Nierra. Gaspar Misa, who had pleaded guilty, received the same sentence but was subject to automatic review. The court ordered the accused to pay a solidary indemnity of 12,000 pesos to the heirs of the victim.

Motivation Behind the Murder

The prosecution's evidence indicated that Paciano Nierra was motivated by a desire to eliminate Juliana, a business competitor in the launch transportation and soft drink sales market. The rivalry was exacerbated by strained family relations, with Juliana being the sister-in-law of Paciano. Aniceto Nierra, Juliana's husband, sought to reduce competition by selling one of Juliana’s launches to Paciano, yet this did not mend their relationship.

Planning and Execution of the Crime

On July 4, 1969, Misa was recruited to carry out the assassination for a payment of 3,000 pesos, facilitated by Doblen, a cousin-in-law of Paciano. Misa conspired with Rojas, who acted as a lookout during the crime, as well as with Gaudencia Nierra, who also agreed to the plot. The murder was planned to take place on the night of July 8, 1969.

The Commission of the Murder

The murder occurred when Misa ambushed Juliana while she was near her house, resulting in her death by a gunshot wound. Paciano and Gaudencia Nierra were reportedly close enough to witness the murder. Misa's escape from the scene was deliberate, and he later attempted to collect a portion of the payment for the crime from Paciano after it was committed.

Confession and Testimony

Misa's confession to the police was crucial, as he explicitly implicated the Nierra spouses, Doblen, and Rojas. His confessions were supported by a reenactment of the crime and additional testimonies that corroborated his narrative. The prosecution also highlighted that Misa had a history of criminal behavior, which fortified his credibility as a witness regarding the motivations and executions surrounding the murder.

Defense Strategies and Contentions

The defense for the Nierra spouses claimed they were not involved in any conspiracy and provided alibis for the night of the murder. They argued Misa lacked credibility due to inconsistencies in his statements and his prior criminal record. However, these arguments were deemed insufficient, as the evidence presented ultimately pointed toward their collusion in the murder.

Court's Findings on Conspiracy and Guilt

The trial court found compelling evidence demonstrating that the Nierra spouses had conspired with Misa and Doblen to carry out the assassination of Juliana Nierra. Their financial incentive and the act of coordinating with Misa for the execution were sufficiently substantiated. The court dismissed the idea that alibi defenses could absolve the Nierra s

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.