Title
People vs. Murray
Case
G.R. No. L-4467
Decision Date
Apr 30, 1959
A widow, Ester del Rosario-Murray, was convicted of parricide for shooting her husband, George C. Murray, motivated by jealousy over his affair, supported by circumstantial evidence and forensic findings.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 180462)

Factual Background

Ester and George married on May 9, 1946. Their relationship appeared loving initially, characterized by shared activities, such as dancing and outings on a yacht. However, difficulties began when George engaged in a romantic relationship with Carolina Trinidad, a young actress known as Carol Varga, which escalated over time, resulting in an affair that ultimately led to George spending less time at home.

The Incident

On August 12, 1949, after George returned home late, he was shot while asleep at around 4:00 AM the following morning. Multiple gunshots were heard, and the couple’s maid and their children discovered George’s lifeless body shortly thereafter. The prosecution presented evidence that Ester, motivated by jealousy, likely committed the crime, supported by eyewitness accounts and circumstantial evidence.

Evidence of Guilt

The police investigation uncovered significant inconsistencies in Ester's account of events compared to the testimonies of the maid and the driver. Evidence included the presence of a revolver, allegedly used in the crime, which was found later by the maid along with spent bullets. Additionally, forensic findings indicated the existence of nitrates on one of Ester’s gloves, which aligned with the usage of a firearm.

Motive for the Crime

The prosecution posited that Ester's motive stemmed from jealousy over George's affair with Carol Varga. Despite her claims of ignorance regarding the affair, testimonies corroborated that Ester was aware of George’s infidelities. Evidence included the destruction of a photograph of George with Carol and her attempts to restrict Carol's access to George's funeral, illustrating her emotional turmoil over the relationship.

Defense and Counterarguments

Ester argued that her husband was killed by an unknown intruder and presented theories to support this claim, including ransacking and theft. However, her testimony faced significant scrutiny due to conflicting evidence, such as the absence of any forced entry, the locked doors, and lack of footprints that would suggest an outsider's involvement.

Judicial Analysis

The court analyzed the circumstantial evidence presented by the prosecution to establish Ester's guilt. It was determined that the multitude of circumstances, when considered collectively, painted a cohesive narrative consistent with her guilt, overshadowing her assertions of innocence. The decision reiterated the legal standards for circumstantial evidence—each element having to align in portraying someon

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources.