Title
People vs. Montealegre
Case
G.R. No. 67948
Decision Date
May 31, 1988
A police officer was stabbed to death after confronting two men smoking marijuana; one stabbed him while the other restrained his hand, leading to convictions for murder with assault on a person in authority.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 67948)

Background of the Incident

The series of events commenced when Edmundo Abadilla, a patron at the restaurant, noticed marijuana smoke at a nearby table. After calling for law enforcement assistance, he encountered Pfc. Camantigue and led him back to the table occupied by Montealegre and Capalad. Upon approaching them, Camantigue attempted to detain both men for drug questioning, leading to a violent confrontation.

The Assault on Pfc. Camantigue

During this confrontation, while Camantigue was holding Montealegre and Capalad, Capalad unexpectedly used a knife to stab Camantigue multiple times. Simultaneously, Montealegre physically restrained Camantigue, preventing him from defending himself, which significantly escalated the danger to the officer. Ultimately, both Camantigue and Capalad died from their injuries, with Camantigue succumbing to seven stab wounds later that night.

Arrest and Testimonies

Montealegre escaped the scene but was apprehended the next day while attempting to leave Cavite City. Autopsy results indicated that Camantigue's death was caused by stab wounds leading to severe internal hemorrhage, and forensic evidence pointed to the involvement of both accused in the act. Testimonies from Abadilla and other witnesses substantiated the claim that Montealegre aided Capalad in the attack by preventing Camantigue from drawing his weapon.

Defense Strategy and Credibility

Montealegre's defense rested on claims of his ignorance regarding the events during the attack, asserting that he had fled the scene before the stabbing occurred. This defense, however, was undermined by the testimonies provided by witnesses, particularly those of Abadilla and Generoso San Juan, who clearly indicated Montealegre's active role in restraining Pfc. Camantigue and ensuring that he could not defend himself against Capalad's assault.

Legal Findings and Verdict

The court ruled that Montealegre was a principal by indispensable cooperation under Article 17, paragraph 3 of the Revised Penal Code. The court confirmed that although he did not wield the knife himself, his actions in restraining the police officer directly contributed to the success of the assault. Furthermore, no prior conspiracy was necessary to establish their collective intention to harm; their actions during the incident demonstrated a shared purpose aligned with criminal intent.

Sentencing and Civil Liability

Having considered Montealegre’s role in the murder of a person in authority and the associated assault, the court affirmed the conviction

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.