Title
Supreme Court
People vs. Molejon
Case
G.R. No. 208091
Decision Date
Apr 23, 2018
Stepfather convicted of raping and sexually abusing minor stepdaughters; Supreme Court affirmed guilt, imposed life imprisonment, and awarded damages.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 208091)

Charges and Allegations

Benito Molejon was charged with five counts of Qualified Rape and eleven counts of Acts of Lasciviousness. The qualified rape accusations involve three instances against his 13-year-old stepdaughter AAA and two against his 11-year-old stepdaughter BBB. The allegations state that rape was committed through force, threat, and intimidation, with the aggravating circumstances that the victims were minors and the offender was their stepparent.

Testimonies and Evidence

During trial, the prosecution presented key witnesses, including the victims AAA and BBB, their mother CCC, a doctor, and a police officer. Both AAA and BBB provided detailed testimonies describing the sexual abuse they underwent at the hands of Molejon. They recounted instances of molestation, with graphic descriptions of the acts committed against them. Importantly, their mother discovered the abuse happening in real-time, prompting the victims to disclose the entire ordeal to her.

Defense Strategy

Molejon denied the accusations, asserting that no threats were made against the victims and questioning their credibility. He argued that any interaction with the victims was consensual and characterized their seemingly normal behavior post-incident as contrary to the actions of a victim. His defense relied on alibi and denial, which the courts generally regard as weak when confronted with credible testimonies from victims.

Lower Court Rulings

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) convicted Molejon of the charges on August 5, 2010, determining that the testimonies presented were credible and consistent, pointing to his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The RTC found the defense's claims of inconsistency in the victims' testimonies unpersuasive, emphasizing that minor discrepancies do not undermine credibility, especially considering the context of the traumatic experiences recounted.

Court of Appeals Decision

The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC's ruling with modifications regarding the damages awarded to the victims. It highlighted that both AAA and BBB’s testimonies were direct and detailed, reiterating the influence of psychological and moral intimidation that inhibited their capability to resist effectively.

Supreme Court Findings

The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts, confirming the convictions. The Court emphasized the trial court's capacity to assess the witnesses and the accountability of Molejon's actions under the law. It reiterated that intimidation, whether through physical or moral coercion, qualifies as sufficient grounds for a conviction of rape. The Court also clarified that the victims’ lack of stronger resistance did not imply consent or diminutive culpability from the offender.

Sentencing and Damages

Molejon was sentenced to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua without eligibility for parole for each count

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is a legal research platform serving the Philippines with case digests and jurisprudence resources. AI digests are study aids only—use responsibly.