Title
People vs. Midoranda
Case
G.R. No. L-2681
Decision Date
Mar 30, 1950
A constabulary detachment, led by Sergeant Margen, tortured Diego Testor for trading fish for camote, leading to his death. Andres Midoranda, who participated in the maltreatment, was convicted of murder despite claiming obedience to superior orders.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 85215)

Incident and Charges

Diego Testor was requested to deliver fish to the constabulary detachment commanded by Sergeant Dario Margen. After trading the fish for camote due to his need to feed his children, Testor was summoned to account for what Sergeant Margen perceived as a breach of trust. In a fit of anger, Margen assaulted Testor and ordered others, including Midoranda, to assist in brutalizing him. Testor was forced to consume raw fish, and after this ordeal, he was taken to Calbayog where he succumbed to his injuries the following day.

Medical Findings and Legal Proceedings

An autopsy revealed that Testor died from internal hemorrhage caused by perforation of the intestines due to fish bones. The prosecution charged Margen, Tarrayo, and Midoranda with murder, but only Midoranda was tried as the other two defendants evaded arrest. The evidence, including eyewitness testimonies, established Midoranda's active participation in the abuse that led to Testor’s death, contradicting his claim of merely observing the events.

Defense Argument

Midroanda's defense rested on the assertion that he acted under the orders of his superior, Sergeant Margen. The argument posited that without proof of conspiracy, he should not be held liable for murder. However, legal provisions in Article 11, paragraph 6 of the Revised Penal Code stipulate that obedience to a superior's order may only exempt one from liability if the order serves a lawful purpose.

Court's Analysis and Conclusion

The court found that the orders given to harm Testor were illegal, as they involved inhumane punishment for a minor offense. Further, it underscored that Midoranda participated in actions fueled not only by duty but also by a personal grievance against Testor for the alleged misappropriation of food intended for th

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.