Title
People vs. Mejorada y Sillan
Case
G.R. No. 102705
Decision Date
Jul 30, 1993
Mrs. Regino accused Mejorada of rape, supported by medical evidence and credible testimony. Despite his alibi, the Supreme Court upheld his conviction, awarding damages despite unpaid filing fees.

Case Summary (G.R. No. 102705)

Jurisdiction and Procedural History

The case originated from a complaint filed by Mrs. Elizabeth B. Regino against Doroteo Mejorada in the Municipal Trial Court of Sta. Cruz, Davao del Sur, on October 11, 1988. The Municipal Trial Court found a prima facie case and forwarded the records to the Office of the Provincial Fiscal, which filed an information for rape before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Digos on November 8, 1988. The RTC convicted the accused on June 14, 1991, sentencing him to reclusion perpetua but not awarding civil damages due to non-payment of appropriate fees.

Allegations of the Crime

The information alleged that on October 7, 1988, in Sta. Cruz, Davao del Sur, Doroteo Mejorada forcibly dragged Mrs. Regino from her house while armed with a knife, and against her will, forced her to have sexual intercourse. The act was characterized by a disregard for her dignity, as she was a school teacher.

Evidence Presentation

During the trial, the prosecution presented credible testimonies from Mrs. Regino and corroborating witnesses, including Vice Mayor Guido and Dr. Ozoa, who provided medical evidence consistent with sexual assault. Mrs. Regino’s statement outlined the trajectory of events leading up to the assault, detailing the threats made by Mejorada during the incident.

Defense Strategy

The defense relied on alibi and denial, asserting that the accused was at a friend’s house during the time of the crime. However, the testimonies from family members did not adequately establish his whereabouts or counter the prosecution’s case. Additionally, Mejorada’s claim of being framed by another man was not substantiated.

Court's Findings on Credibility

The trial court found the testimonies of the prosecution's witnesses—especially that of Mrs. Regino—to be credible, noting her demeanor and the lack of any ill-motive for her allegations. In contrast, the defense failed to convince the court of Mejorada's innocence. The RTC took special note of the physical evidence presented, including the weapon used and the medical examination results indicating trauma consistent with rape.

Appellant's Arguments

Mejorada's appeal argued that the trial court erred in its judgment by claiming the prosecution lacked clear and convincing evidence. He pointed to weaknesses in Mrs. Regino’s account, but the court found these assertions to be inadequate, particularly in light of the corroborative testimonies and physical evidence.

Legal Conclusions and Ruling

The appellate court affirmed the conviction, emphasizing the trial court's proper assessment of witness credibility and the weight given to corroborative evidence. The court ruled that the accused’s conduct constituted rape under the Revised Penal Code, given the threats made using a deadly weapon during the commission of the crime.

D

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.